50
. Time to compute reduced model using IRKA
A1000r
Output error (IRKA vs. quasi-active)

---h = 2 μm (N = 41364)
---h = 0.5 μm (N = 165330)

Figure 2.13: A) Time to compute the reduced system, and B) maximum absolute error between
the quasi-active and reduced system output using IRKA on cell n408. Solid lines correspond to
the N = 41364 case, while dashed lines are for the N = 165330 case. In (A) the sudden drop in
computation time around к = 10 occurs for both cases because at that point, though the shifts have
not converged, the reduced system is accurate to a tolerance of 3 digits or more
the soma is the site of action potential generation, we only need to check whether
y(t) = υσ{t) ≥ Vth
(2.44)
where V⅛ ɪs some threshold voltage (recall that vσ(t) ≡ v1(∕bι,t)). At each time-
step during the simulation we check if threshold was reached, and if so then we
instantaneously reset the soma voltage to the rest and hold it there for a refractory
period of τref ms.
2.7.1 Thresholding at the Soma
Reset values should be chosen to produce as much similarity as possible between
the outputs of the active and quasi-active models while still being biophysically rea-
More intriguing information
1. SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE2. Spectral calibration of exponential Lévy Models [1]
3. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
4. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
5. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats