The name is absent

84

Table 3.3: Performance of reduced model (here k_v = feʃ) of HH fork, N = 1501, as
compared with the full model. The first simulation set does not use Branch-Ortho for the
reduced system, while the next four sets use it, leading to far superior accuracy.

Table 3.4: Performance of reduced model (here k_υ = kf~) of HHA fork, N == 1501, as
compared with the full model.

kept the same, except in this case, we use εj^,_oca∣ = 10^⁴ and ε₁ζ_cal = 10^-5₁ and we
use 1000 random stimuli of between 0-250 pA. Note that the tolerances here are
not tuned to give the best performance, but rather have been chosen after just a
little experimentation to give good performance; it is possible that a better choice
may exist. Even though the spatially-varying A-type K⁺ conductance necessitates a
slightly larger reduced system in order maintain the accuracy seen in the HH fork,
we still observe a similar speed-up, as Table 3.4 indicates.

<<   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   >>

More intriguing information