The name is absent



while. Figure 2.1 illustrates the evolution of insurance regulation.

Paul v.

1869

VA      Sherman Act

1890

I               I                   I- __________

U.S. v. SEUA
1944

I
_______LJ_________

O’ Mahoney
Committee

1958

I_________________________________________

I_______________________________________________

Anti-trust
challenge to ISO

1988

I____________________________________________________I

----------------1-------------------------------------1-----------------------

1877

Local 8ι
regional
bureaus
formed

----------------------1-----------------------------------------------

1910

Merritt
Committee

-------Fl---------

t

1945
McCarran-

Ferguson Act

------------------1-----------------------------------------

--------------------1-----------------------------------------------

1970’s

End of bureau
rates

-------------------1----------------------------------------------------------------------1

1997

New ISO
for profit

Figure 2.1: The Evolution of Insurance Regulation

Nowadays, the insurance industry is generally under state regulation with a few
exceptions, although the supporters of federal insurance regulation have been continu-
ing pushing for a change. Furthermore, competition starts playing a bigger role in the
insurance regulation than it used to, although some states still have very restrictive
insurance regulation.

Over time, the highly regulated environment became one of the main character-
istics of the insurance industry. The function of the insurance regulation is two-fold.
The government needs to ensure that insurers maintain a high level of solvency to
meet the obligations of paying claims; and meanwhile stringently supervise the insur-
ance sales, marketing, and policy terms to make sure that the consumers are treated
fairly when they purchase insurance products and file claims.

Because of such strict regulatory environment of the insurance industry, govern-
ment decisions can still cast a huge impact on insurance companies’ practices in the
twenty first century. For example, in 2006, in order to avoid consumer discrimina-



More intriguing information

1. Endogenous Determination of FDI Growth and Economic Growth:The OECD Case
2. The name is absent
3. A Study of Adult 'Non-Singers' In Newfoundland
4. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
5. Types of Tax Concessions for Promoting Investment in Free Economic and Trade Areas
6. The name is absent
7. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
8. Consumer Networks and Firm Reputation: A First Experimental Investigation
9. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
10. Tissue Tracking Imaging for Identifying the Origin of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias: A New Role of Cardiac Ultrasound in Electrophysiology