52
method (Efron, 1979). By the algorithm in Section 3.3, it can be seen that the final
survival estimator <S0(∙) has jumps at event time points only. And R(β) has jumps at
informative censored time points only.
Ties
When there are tied failure events, the proposed method (Equation of likelihood
function 3.10 and 3.11) can handle them as in the Breslow’s (1974) method. Actually,
if we view the pieces of mass Di(xβ, i = 1,..., j, as ties at time xj, then the formation
of the lβτ∖β) and Lf'c∖ββ (in Equations 3.10 and 3.11) are obtained from Breslow’s
method. In the simulation process, ties can be avoided easily. In the application case,
for simplicity, we trimmed the data before fitting the model to eliminate ties, which
has no impact to the conclusion. See details in Chapter 4.
Values of the a
In this research, the parameter a was not estimated. Instead, it was assumed to
be known. In reality, it is unknown. But when knowledge is available from experts
or literature about the degree and direction of the association between events and
informative censoring, our approach can be used to obtain less biased parameter es-
timates. If not much knowledge is available, the proposed method can be used to do
a sensitivity analysis in a very conservative way, just as was done by Park, Tian and
Wei (2006). That is, letting the Kendall’s τ change from near -1 to near 1 to perform
More intriguing information
1. School Effectiveness in Developing Countries - A Summary of the Research Evidence2. Fiscal Sustainability Across Government Tiers
3. Implementation of the Ordinal Shapley Value for a three-agent economy
4. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
5. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
6. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
7. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.