The name is absent



70

significant when the values of τ vary. For example, “Size” in both scenarios.

Furthermore, parameter estimates vary when the correlation between the depen-
dent censoring and events changes. In some cases, the estimates vary slightly. For
example, “Age” from the second scenario. The estimates may vary quite a bit. For
instance, “Profit” in the first scenario. Detailed results are shown below.

• Tests 3, 4, 5 and 6

Tables 4.3 - 4.12 present parameter estimates and related standard errors and 95
percent confidence intervals for both bankruptcy and acquisition scenarios. Figures
4.1 - 4.10 illustrate such data graphically. In those figures, “Beta” represents the first
scenario and “Betac” represents the second. Р-values are calculated based on the fact
that the following statistic (
-g∙‰)2 follows the χ2 distribution.

Figure 4.11 shows the cumulative hazard curve of bankruptcy obtained using the
proposed method and its 95 percent confidence interval. It will be further discussed
in Chapter 5.

Table 4.3: Results for Covariate 1 - Growth for Bankruptcies

τ = —0.5

τ = 0

τ = 0.2

τ = 0.5

τ = 0.8

Parameters

-0.870

0.116

0.204

0.169

0.166

SE of Est

1.127

0.440

0.232

0.247

0.208

Upper Bound

1.338

0.978

0.658

0.654

0.575

Lower Bound

-3.079

-0.746

-0.251

-0.315

-0.242



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Foreword: Special Issue on Invasive Species
3. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
4. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
5. CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ALTERNATIVE POULTRY
6. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
7. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON VIRGINIA DAIRY FARMS
8. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
9. Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the Euro Area
10. The Impact of Optimal Tariffs and Taxes on Agglomeration