The name is absent



capacity of this chapter. Figure 2.0 is a general purification diagram (covering
objects 1.0-3.1) which at a high level illustrates the purification process from an
unclean (object 1.0) to clean (object 3.0) state.

Figure 3.0 - Purification Model, 1952-19604

1.1 Offenses

Offense Type (Murder, Theft)
OffenseDate
OffenseResuIt


1—(l.0 Unclean)


(з.О Clean)-+

¥


j⅛≤(3.1 Reιnw⅛<l Offenses)




2.0 Purification

AffKed Name
Purification Reason
Puriftn Type (Trad, Church)
Purification Organization Name
Purification Specialist Name
Purification Date
Purification Locffion
Purification Completion Date
Oender Indicator(MIF)
Payment type(animal, money..)
PaymentAmourt





2.2 Uininal

Restiype

Rest Duration



о

A

(2.1.1 ItivokeSpffits)


(2.1.2 Pinging NegatMty) (2.2.1 Strengthening)


0

A

(2.2.2 Heating)


> .......>

2.0.4 Ancestor ⅜Spirit Type

Spirit Type Description
Ancestor Description

Local Ancestor (ylh)
Family Head Ancestor (yih)
LocationHead Ancestor (yJh)


{>

A

(2.3.1 RetumtoCommuniiy)


4Figure 3.0 Represents my interpretation of the purification process

191



More intriguing information

1. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
2. The name is absent
3. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
4. Implementation of the Ordinal Shapley Value for a three-agent economy
5. Howard Gardner : the myth of Multiple Intelligences
6. The name is absent
7. On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model
8. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement
9. GENE EXPRESSION AND ITS DISCONTENTS Developmental disorders as dysfunctions of epigenetic cognition
10. Two-Part Tax Controls for Forest Density and Rotation Time