where σ = minimum eigen value of AAτ. For a = 0.05, will be 591.13. It is
clearly far from the optimal regularization factor, λopt (Figure 4.5).
Tb understand the behavior of the best λ, we study optimal point curves of
й the problem. For each λ ∈ [λo,∞), let xχ be the solution of the problem in
¥
Equation 4.13. Define
s(ʌ) = lkλ∣∣ι
t(λ) = ∣∣Arλ - b∣∣2. (4.15)
(s(λ),i(λ)) defines a curve in s-t plane. A number of these curves are shown in
Figure 4.6. These curves are for different noise levels. The points that are shown
by star on each curve represent the optimal regularization factor, (s(λopt), s(λopt));
we call these point optimal points. It suggests that the optimal points are approx-
imately on a horizontal line. Thus, we use following optimization formulation to
estimate the variation.
min ∣∣Ar — 6∣∣2
such that ∣∣τ∣∣ι ≤ c
(4.16)
where c is a constant number. We assume c = 0-E(∣∣τ∣∣ι); where θ ∈ [1.5,2].
54
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent
3. Standards behaviours face to innovation of the entrepreneurships of Beira Interior
4. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
5. From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience. Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli
6. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
7. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
8. Dual Track Reforms: With and Without Losers
9. Foreword: Special Issue on Invasive Species
10. The name is absent