0.08
0.075
0.07
0.065
0.06
0.055
0.05
0.045

0.04-------------,-------------'-------------1-------?-----,-------------1~
0 5 10 15 20 25
Regularization coefficient λ
30
Figure 4.5: The variation estimation error for various regularization factors λ.
4.4 Determining the regularization coefficient λ
Consider ^-regularization problem,
min ∣∣τ∣∣ι + λ∣∣Aa? — fe∣∣2∙ (4-13)
When λ is very small, λ∣∣Ax — b∖∣2 would be small compared to the ^ɪ-norm term,
∣∣x∣∣ι and does not affect objective function dramatically. Thus, norm-one term
H:r∣∣ι is the main component that determines the solution of the regularization
problem; the solution tends to be sparse. In the other hand, when λ is very large,
λ∣∣√Lr — fe∣∣2 would be large compared to the norm-one term, ∣∣x∣∣ι, and small
changes in ∣∣√4τ — b∣∣2 result in large changes in objective function. In general, λ
balances between sparsity (Д-norm term) and fitting to measurements (∕⅛-norm
term).
Measurement noise and sparsity of the vector x are two major components
51
More intriguing information
1. Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis2. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Les freins culturels à l'adoption des IFRS en Europe : une analyse du cas français
6. TOMOGRAPHIC IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION OF FAN-BEAM PROJECTIONS WITH EQUIDISTANT DETECTORS USING PARTIALLY CONNECTED NEURAL NETWORKS
7. What should educational research do, and how should it do it? A response to “Will a clinical approach make educational research more relevant to practice” by Jacquelien Bulterman-Bos
8. The name is absent
9. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies
10. Placentophagia in Nonpregnant Nulliparous Mice: A Genetic Investigation1