vector. The figure demonstrates that the (3,5) Biorthogonal wavelet basis best
describes the spatial variations. We use this wavelet basis for the remainder of
this thesis.
4.3.2 Gates on the regular grids
When gates are located on a regular grid, the two-dimensional wavelet transform
of the variations, s, can be expressed as the product of the variation vector, 1,
with the wavelet transform matrix W.
s = Wl. (4.10)
As discussed in Section 4.3.1, s is assumed sparse because of the spatial correlation
in the variations. We enforce the sparsity prior by regularizing Equation 4.9 using
the norm of s, as described in Section 2.2.2:
min ∣∣s∣∣ι + λ∣∣Al - b∣∣∣ (4.11)
or, equivalently,
min ∣∣s∣∣ι + λ∣∣AW-1s — b∣∣2, (4.12)
where λ is the regularization coefficient. Sparsity of the variations wavelet trans-
formation, s, provides a new piece of information. We call this method ^ɪ-
regularization method.
49
More intriguing information
1. Infrastructure Investment in Network Industries: The Role of Incentive Regulation and Regulatory Independence2. Do Decision Makers' Debt-risk Attitudes Affect the Agency Costs of Debt?
3. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
4. Macro-regional evaluation of the Structural Funds using the HERMIN modelling framework
5. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation
6. Elicited bid functions in (a)symmetric first-price auctions
7. The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention
8. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
9. Constrained School Choice
10. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY