47
Figure 3.9 : (Al) and (Bl) Estimated impulse response function (IRF) using a GWN stimu-
lus in dim light for a rod and cone, respectively. Red traces show response with HCN block.
(A2) and (B2) Estimated IRF at bright light intensities for a rod and cone, respectively. (A3)
Shows the IRF predicted frequency responses for rod in dim light and (B3) shows the same
for a cone in bright light. These plots are similar to the frequency response estimated directly
in figure 8 A3 and B3.
More intriguing information
1. Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany2. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement
3. The name is absent
4. Fiscal Reform and Monetary Union in West Africa
5. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
6. The name is absent
7. Performance - Complexity Comparison of Receivers for a LTE MIMO–OFDM System
8. The ultimate determinants of central bank independence
9. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
10. The name is absent