47


Figure 3.9 : (Al) and (Bl) Estimated impulse response function (IRF) using a GWN stimu-
lus in dim light for a rod and cone, respectively. Red traces show response with HCN block.
(A2) and (B2) Estimated IRF at bright light intensities for a rod and cone, respectively. (A3)
Shows the IRF predicted frequency responses for rod in dim light and (B3) shows the same
for a cone in bright light. These plots are similar to the frequency response estimated directly
in figure 8 A3 and B3.
More intriguing information
1. Healthy state, worried workers: North Carolina in the world economy2. Institutions, Social Norms, and Bargaining Power: An Analysis of Individual Leisure Time in Couple Households
3. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
4. On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model
5. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
6. A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach
7. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
8. Structure and objectives of Austria's foreign direct investment in the four adjacent Central and Eastern European countries Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovenia and Slovakia
9. The Complexity Era in Economics
10. Robust Econometrics