47
Figure 3.9 : (Al) and (Bl) Estimated impulse response function (IRF) using a GWN stimu-
lus in dim light for a rod and cone, respectively. Red traces show response with HCN block.
(A2) and (B2) Estimated IRF at bright light intensities for a rod and cone, respectively. (A3)
Shows the IRF predicted frequency responses for rod in dim light and (B3) shows the same
for a cone in bright light. These plots are similar to the frequency response estimated directly
in figure 8 A3 and B3.
More intriguing information
1. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?2. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.
3. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
4. Workforce or Workfare?
5. The name is absent
6. Consciousness, cognition, and the hierarchy of context: extending the global neuronal workspace model
7. The problem of anglophone squint
8. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
9. An Attempt to 2
10. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates