45
Figure 3.8 : (Al) Normal rod light response to flashes of increasing light intensity. (Bl) Nor-
mal cone response to a flash of light. Response to the same stimulus after blocking HCN
channels with ZD 7288 is shown in red. (A2) Rod and (B2) cone response to frequency-
chirped light stimulus before and after HCN block. (A3) and (B3) demonstrate the ampli-
tude vs frequency for chirped light stimuli. Solid lines show population means (n=4 for A3
and n=3 for B3), while crosses show the data for traces shown in A2 and B2, respectively.
When HCN channels are blocked, a steady decay in the frequency response of both rod and
cone photoreceptors, at dim and bright light intensities respectively.
More intriguing information
1. Learning-by-Exporting? Firm-Level Evidence for UK Manufacturing and Services Sectors2. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
3. The migration of unskilled youth: Is there any wage gain?
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Linking Indigenous Social Capital to a Global Economy
7. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
8. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA
9. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
10. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise