45
Figure 3.8 : (Al) Normal rod light response to flashes of increasing light intensity. (Bl) Nor-
mal cone response to a flash of light. Response to the same stimulus after blocking HCN
channels with ZD 7288 is shown in red. (A2) Rod and (B2) cone response to frequency-
chirped light stimulus before and after HCN block. (A3) and (B3) demonstrate the ampli-
tude vs frequency for chirped light stimuli. Solid lines show population means (n=4 for A3
and n=3 for B3), while crosses show the data for traces shown in A2 and B2, respectively.
When HCN channels are blocked, a steady decay in the frequency response of both rod and
cone photoreceptors, at dim and bright light intensities respectively.
More intriguing information
1. Food Prices and Overweight Patterns in Italy2. The name is absent
3. The fundamental determinants of financial integration in the European Union
4. Weather Forecasting for Weather Derivatives
5. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
6. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
10. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004