76
Response-Intensity Curves
Intensity
Figure 5.2 : (A) Average maximum response amplitudes for rods (n=6) and cones (n=3)
averaged over two directions. (B) Maximum response amplitude vs logarithmic light in-
tensity of a whole-field flash stimulus for dark adapted and background light adapted rods
and cones fit with the Hill equation V = A∕(l + (Λ'1∕2∕x)n)∙ (ɑ) Normalized cone response
compared with cone stimulus transformed by cone response sensitivity in B to yield stimulus
intensity. (D) Measured rod response compared with theoretical uncoupled rod response
from transforming stimulus intensity from C with rod sensitivity in B.
Bar position (μm)
More intriguing information
1. The Context of Sense and Sensibility2. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement
3. Feature type effects in semantic memory: An event related potentials study
4. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
5. School Effectiveness in Developing Countries - A Summary of the Research Evidence
6. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
7. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
8. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“
9. An alternative way to model merit good arguments
10. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin