76

Response-Intensity Curves

Intensity

Figure 5.2 : (A) Average maximum response amplitudes for rods (n=6) and cones (n=3)
averaged over two directions. (B) Maximum response amplitude vs logarithmic light in-
tensity of a whole-field flash stimulus for dark adapted and background light adapted rods
and cones fit with the Hill equation V = A∕(l + (Λ'1∕2∕x)n)∙ (ɑ) Normalized cone response
compared with cone stimulus transformed by cone response sensitivity in B to yield stimulus
intensity. (D) Measured rod response compared with theoretical uncoupled rod response
from transforming stimulus intensity from C with rod sensitivity in B.

Bar position (μm)
More intriguing information
1. Learning and Endogenous Business Cycles in a Standard Growth Model2. Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany
3. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
4. The name is absent
5. Eigentumsrechtliche Dezentralisierung und institutioneller Wettbewerb
6. Orientation discrimination in WS 2
7. The name is absent
8. Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!? On the Role of Entrepreneurial Experience for Firm Survival
9. Categorial Grammar and Discourse
10. AGRICULTURAL TRADE IN THE URUGUAY ROUND: INTO FINAL BATTLE