76
Response-Intensity Curves
Intensity
Figure 5.2 : (A) Average maximum response amplitudes for rods (n=6) and cones (n=3)
averaged over two directions. (B) Maximum response amplitude vs logarithmic light in-
tensity of a whole-field flash stimulus for dark adapted and background light adapted rods
and cones fit with the Hill equation V = A∕(l + (Λ'1∕2∕x)n)∙ (ɑ) Normalized cone response
compared with cone stimulus transformed by cone response sensitivity in B to yield stimulus
intensity. (D) Measured rod response compared with theoretical uncoupled rod response
from transforming stimulus intensity from C with rod sensitivity in B.
Bar position (μm)
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
3. Income Growth and Mobility of Rural Households in Kenya: Role of Education and Historical Patterns in Poverty Reduction
4. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Crime as a Social Cost of Poverty and Inequality: A Review Focusing on Developing Countries
9. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
10. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development