77
spatial response of a single rod.
Figure 5.3 : Estimated space constant of of rod network. (A) Normalized rod response
compared with rod response deconvolved with theoretical isolated rod response from fig-
ure 5.2 D. (B, C) Each side of the deconvolved response fit with a single exponential decay
r - к exp (-æ/(ʌin)). Values of λ of 17.4 and 9.8 μm correspond through equation 5.5 to
7 =0.91 and 3.31, respectively. Assuming an isolated rod membrane impedance Rm ≈ 300
MΩ, these values of gamma predict a coupling resistance Rc of 272 and 994 MΩ.
Figure 5.2D shows the theoretical isolated rod response to the light bar compared to
the actual rod response in the network. The theoretical isolated rod response has a larger
amplitude than the actual response due to an absence of signal spread to coupled rods. Next,
More intriguing information
1. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine2. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
3. Commitment devices, opportunity windows, and institution building in Central Asia
4. Delayed Manifestation of T ransurethral Syndrome as a Complication of T ransurethral Prostatic Resection
5. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
6. The name is absent
7. Insurance within the firm
8. News Not Noise: Socially Aware Information Filtering
9. Une Classe de Concepts
10. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION