The name is absent



Figure 3.4                                                                      32

(Left) The finite element model is solved with a constant charge density boundary
condition from
D = 40 nm to D = 11 nm as in Chapter 2. Note that these values of D
are for the data shown in Figure 3.2. For other data sets, the D values will be different.
For D=Il nm and less, we vary the lipids surface charge density according to the law
governing the phenomenon being addressed (i.e. whether it is counterion binding or
mobile lipid charge regulation).

Figure 3.5                                                                      32

Do is chosen as the point where the AFM data starts deviating significantly from
the electrostatic simulation of Chapter 2. For the above sample, Do = 11 nm. The
AFM data and the electrostatic simulation shown here is the same as in Figure 3.2.

Figure 3.6                                                                   33

Schematic of how the tip-induced charge regulation finite element model is
implemented. Here,
ψ is the surface potential σ is the surface charge density of the
lipid bilayer and
F is the electrostatic force on the tip. The functional form of g
will depend on the form of charge regulation being considered (e.g. charge regulation
due to counterion binding).

Figure 3.7                                                                   35

Comparison of the AFM data with the van der Waals computational model.
The AFM data and the electrostatic simulation shown here are the same as in
Figure 3.2.

Figure 3.8                                                                   37

Comparison of the AFM data with the van der Waals and stem layer
inclusive computational model. The AFM data and the electrostatic simulation
shown here is the same as in Figure 3.2.

Figure 3.9                                                                   38

AFM data for a Si3N4 sample fit with a model that includes charge regulation
due to cation binding via a Langmuir isotherm. (Black, solid curve) - AFM data,
(Red, dashed curve) - constant surface charge electrostatic model,
(Blue, solid curve) - cation binding model.

Figure 3.10                                                                 40

Data fit with the Boltzmann relaxation model of mobile lipid charge regulation.

The AFM data and the electrostatic simulation shown here is the same as in Figure 3.2.

Figure3.il                                                               42

(Top) DOPC-neutral at pH 7, (Bottom) DOPS-anionic. A mixture of these lipids
will be in fluid phase at room temperature.

IX



More intriguing information

1. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
5. NATURAL RESOURCE SUPPLY CONSTRAINTS AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: A COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH
6. The name is absent
7. Skill and work experience in the European knowledge economy
8. A Rare Case Of Fallopian Tube Cancer
9. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
10. Eigentumsrechtliche Dezentralisierung und institutioneller Wettbewerb
11. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
12. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY
13. Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis
14. Ability grouping in the secondary school: attitudes of teachers of practically based subjects
15. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
16. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
17. A Unified Model For Developmental Robotics
18. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent