On the job rotation problem



nodes.

Proof. Let 1, . . . , σt} be a collection of PND cycles in D(A) covering l nodes
with
σi having odd length for i = 1, . . . , r and even length otherwise. By
splitting the cycles
σi for i = r+ 1, . . . , t if needed, we may assume that all these
cycles are 2-cycles. By splitting one by one the cycles
σi - vi for vi V (σi)
and
i = 1, . . . , r, we get that δl-i = 0 for i = 1, . . . , r. After these splittings,
all remaining cycles are 2-cycles and removing them one by one proves the
result.                                                                           □

Corollary 4. Let A Tn×n be a symmetric matrix. For all even k ≤ kmax ,
δk (A) = 0, and if δk (A) = 0 for some odd k N then δk-1 (A) = 0.

If A has at least one zero on the main diagonal, (or equivalently, if the
digraph
D(A) has at least one loop), then we can derive a number of properties:

Theorem 5. If A Tn×n is a symmetric matrix, and there exists a collection
of PND cycles in
D(A) covering l nodes, at least one of which is a loop, then
δk (A) = 0 for all k ≤ l.

Proof. Let 1 , . . . , σt} be a collection of PND cycles in D(A) covering kmax
nodes with σi having odd length for i = 1, . . . , r and even length otherwise.
Assume
σr is a loop. By splitting the cycles σi for i = r + 1, . . . , t if needed, we
may assume that all these cycles are 2-cycles. By splitting one by one the cycles
σi -vi for vi V (σi) and i = 1, . . . , r- 1, we get that δl-i = 0 for i = 1, . . . , r- 1.
After these splittings, all remaining cycles except
σr are 2-cycles. Removing the
2-cycles one by one gives us
δl-i = 0 for odd i {r + 1, . . . , l - 1}. Removing
σr and the 2-cycles one by one gives us δl-i = 0 for even i {r,... ,l}.       □

If l {kmax, kmax - 1} in Theorem 5, then we can completely solve the
(non-weighted) JRP for this type of matrix:

Theorem 6. If A Tn×n is a symmetric matrix, l {kmax, kmax - 1} and
there exists a collection of PND cycles in
D(A) covering l nodes, at least one of
which is a loop, then
δk (A) = 0 for all k ≤ kmax .

Proof. The statement immediately follows from Theorem 5 and the fact that
δkmaχ (A)=0.                                                      □

Theorem 7. If A = (aij) Tn×n is a symmetric matrix and D(A) contains a
loop, then
δk (A) = 0 for all k ≤ kmax .



More intriguing information

1. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica
2. Fiscal federalism and Fiscal Autonomy: Lessons for the UK from other Industrialised Countries
3. The name is absent
4. A Regional Core, Adjacent, Periphery Model for National Economic Geography Analysis
5. Fiscal Sustainability Across Government Tiers
6. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
7. The name is absent
8. 03-01 "Read My Lips: More New Tax Cuts - The Distributional Impacts of Repealing Dividend Taxation"
9. How to do things without words: Infants, utterance-activity and distributed cognition.
10. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior