On the job rotation problem



nodes.

Proof. Let 1, . . . , σt} be a collection of PND cycles in D(A) covering l nodes
with
σi having odd length for i = 1, . . . , r and even length otherwise. By
splitting the cycles
σi for i = r+ 1, . . . , t if needed, we may assume that all these
cycles are 2-cycles. By splitting one by one the cycles
σi - vi for vi V (σi)
and
i = 1, . . . , r, we get that δl-i = 0 for i = 1, . . . , r. After these splittings,
all remaining cycles are 2-cycles and removing them one by one proves the
result.                                                                           □

Corollary 4. Let A Tn×n be a symmetric matrix. For all even k ≤ kmax ,
δk (A) = 0, and if δk (A) = 0 for some odd k N then δk-1 (A) = 0.

If A has at least one zero on the main diagonal, (or equivalently, if the
digraph
D(A) has at least one loop), then we can derive a number of properties:

Theorem 5. If A Tn×n is a symmetric matrix, and there exists a collection
of PND cycles in
D(A) covering l nodes, at least one of which is a loop, then
δk (A) = 0 for all k ≤ l.

Proof. Let 1 , . . . , σt} be a collection of PND cycles in D(A) covering kmax
nodes with σi having odd length for i = 1, . . . , r and even length otherwise.
Assume
σr is a loop. By splitting the cycles σi for i = r + 1, . . . , t if needed, we
may assume that all these cycles are 2-cycles. By splitting one by one the cycles
σi -vi for vi V (σi) and i = 1, . . . , r- 1, we get that δl-i = 0 for i = 1, . . . , r- 1.
After these splittings, all remaining cycles except
σr are 2-cycles. Removing the
2-cycles one by one gives us
δl-i = 0 for odd i {r + 1, . . . , l - 1}. Removing
σr and the 2-cycles one by one gives us δl-i = 0 for even i {r,... ,l}.       □

If l {kmax, kmax - 1} in Theorem 5, then we can completely solve the
(non-weighted) JRP for this type of matrix:

Theorem 6. If A Tn×n is a symmetric matrix, l {kmax, kmax - 1} and
there exists a collection of PND cycles in
D(A) covering l nodes, at least one of
which is a loop, then
δk (A) = 0 for all k ≤ kmax .

Proof. The statement immediately follows from Theorem 5 and the fact that
δkmaχ (A)=0.                                                      □

Theorem 7. If A = (aij) Tn×n is a symmetric matrix and D(A) contains a
loop, then
δk (A) = 0 for all k ≤ kmax .



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
3. The Cost of Food Safety Technologies in the Meat and Poultry Industries.
4. Co-ordinating European sectoral policies against the background of European Spatial Development
5. The name is absent
6. A dynamic approach to the tendency of industries to cluster
7. The name is absent
8. Qualification-Mismatch and Long-Term Unemployment in a Growth-Matching Model
9. Surveying the welfare state: challenges, policy development and causes of resilience
10. The name is absent