The name is absent



Byron’s Social Doctrine         21

a boy named Ludd, who had broken a frame some years
before because he felt that it was the cause of his poverty.
The rioters were admonished and threatened, but to no avail.
Finally, the military was called out in an effort to curb the
frame-breaking. This action served only to fan the flame,
and, with brief intervals of quiet, the rioting continued
throughout the early months of 1812.

Contemporary accounts of these uprisings indicate that
the sympathy of the populace, as it was exhibited in the
press, was not with the rioters. There seemed to be no idea
of providing relief for these sufferers. They were guilty of a
crime and should be punished for it. There is also evidence
in these accounts that the weavers were not bent on whole-
sale destruction of everything which came before them. They
had not reached a stage of mob violence. The following ac-
count is a good example of the disposition of the Luddites:

In one house they had much trouble to obtain a light;
and, while rummaging a cupboard to procure one, they dis-
covered some plate and other valuables; but, having ob-
tained a bit of paper, they shut the door, nor touched any
thing in the house but the frames, which were the object
of their vengeance. In another house it was well understood,
that from fifty to seventy guineas were kept by the master;
but, having exercised their wrath upon the obnoxious
iron,
they left the gold in possesion of the owner. . . . They
wanted . . . the destruction of those instruments which
prevented them from obtaining a Bvelihood. One poor man
begged of the rioters to spare two frames that had been
the fruit of his industry for many years: his request was
granted.5

Certainly this is not the description of an Tmdisciplined mob.
On February 20, 1812, a bill, increasing the severity of
punishment for frame-breaking, was passed by the House of
Commons. As it was introduced into the House of Lords, it
(1) rendered the offence of frame-breaking punishable by
death, and (2) compelled owners of frames to give informa-



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Three Policies to Improve Productivity Growth in Canada
3. Nurses' retention and hospital characteristics in New South Wales, CHERE Discussion Paper No 52
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
7. Wirkt eine Preisregulierung nur auf den Preis?: Anmerkungen zu den Wirkungen einer Preisregulierung auf das Werbevolumen
8. Linkages between research, scholarship and teaching in universities in China
9. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
10. Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung? Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
15. The name is absent
16. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
17. Dendritic Inhibition Enhances Neural Coding Properties
18. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?
19. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment
20. Effort and Performance in Public-Policy Contests