The name is absent



SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE SIEGEL FORMULA

73


A General Siegel Formula. If ρ ;G → Aut(Ar) is an absolutely admissible
representation of a connected, simply connected, senιisimple group G in
a vector spade X, all defined over к, Γ and E' are both defined and they
are equal.

Actually, the assumption that G is simply connected may not be necessary.
The above conjectural formula is, so to speak, the main part of a complete
Siegel formula, and it consists of
I' = E', its analogues for subrepresen-
tations of
p, and of identities of lesser significance, if not trivial. As for
its proof, we can reduce the general case to the case where G is absolutely
simple. Therefore, it is enough to verify the conjecture case-by-case
using the classification. At any rate, if this is true, we will get a rather natural
domain of validity for all Siegel formulas.

On the other hand, in the case when there is only one G-invariant f(x),
we can consider the zeta-function of the morphism f. We recall that such
a zeta-function, where
f{x) is a quadratic form, has been investigated in
detail by Siegel [6]. Also, Ono [d] has examined a similarly defined zeta-
function in the case where /(x) is an arbitrary polynomial. Now, suppose
that ∕-1(i) is a G-orbit for every
i ≠ O. Let dx denote the translation-
invariant gauge-form on
X defined over к and put

θ(x) ≈f(xγκ∙dx,

in which κ-deg(∕) = dim(X). Let A = (λp) denote the standard “con-
vergence factor’’ of
Y = X--1(0), i.e., λu = (1 — (<fυ)-1)~1 with qυ
denoting the number of elements in the residue field of к for each non archi-
median valuation
v on k. Then, we get the so-called Tamagawa measure
I
λθ(x)4 on Ya . Let Φ denote an arbitrary function in -IYfX a) and s a complex
variable. Then, the integral

z(s,Φ) = ɛ Φ(χ)∙∣∕ω∣sA∙μθ(x)∣x

defines a holomorphic function in Re(s) > κ. It is expected that this function
has an analytic continuation to the entire s-plane as a meromorphic func-
tion with eventual poles of order 1, the number of which is twice the number
of G-Orbits in ≠1(t>), and satisfies the functional equation

Z(s,Φ) = Z(κ — s, Φ*),

in which Φ* is the Fourier transform of Φ on Xλ with respect to the nor-
malized measure ∣
dx 14.



More intriguing information

1. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Consumer Networks and Firm Reputation: A First Experimental Investigation
5. BODY LANGUAGE IS OF PARTICULAR IMPORTANCE IN LARGE GROUPS
6. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
7. Une Classe de Concepts
8. International Financial Integration*
9. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
14. American trade policy towards Sub Saharan Africa –- a meta analysis of AGOA
15. Auction Design without Commitment
16. MATHEMATICS AS AN EXACT AND PRECISE LANGUAGE OF NATURE
17. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
18. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent