The name is absent



74


RICE UNIVERSITY STUDIES


4. Before we explain the example that we mentioned in the beginning,
we shall point out one of the difficulties that we have encountered in proving
the Siegel formula. For the sake of simplicity, assume that there is only
one G-invariant /(x). Let
ku denote the completion of к with respect to
an arbitrary valuation
v on к and χυ the и-component of the global charac-
ter
χ. Let I dxv denote a Haar measure on Xu = Xk ®k kυ and Φo a function
in the Schwartz-Bruhat space У(Х„). Consider the function
F* on kυ
defined by

= £ Φ0(χ)∙χυ(∕(χ)i*)∙pχ∣u.

The problem is, then, to find good “asymptotic estimates” of Fu*(J*)
for all V and the “asymptotic expansions to 2 terms” of Fv*(i*) for almost
all v, both as i* tends to ∞ in ku.
It is important that Φu is not restricted
to any subspace of
У (Xu) As we know, this becomes a problem only when
the degree of /(x) is at least 3. It appears that a solution of this problem
is the key to settling various conjectures that we have enunciated.

As we have remarked at the end of Section 1, there are essentially two
infinite sequences of new absolutely admissible representations. One of
them consists of the second fundamental representations for Worms
G of
SLm for in
= 2,3,∙∙∙. For the sake of simplicity, assume that G = SLm over
к and, disregarding the trivial case of an odd m, assume that m = 2n. In
this case, let
X denote the vector space of alternating matrices of degree 2n
and put p(g)∙x = gx,g for g in G and x in X. Then, the Pfaffian Pf(x)
of x gives the morphism Pf : X → I(X) = Ω. Furthermore, we have U(i) =
(P∕)'^1(i) for every
i ≠ 0. Let Ur denote the set of all x in X satisfying
rank(x) =
2r for 0 ≤ r ≤ n. Then Ur is a G-orbit for r ≠ n and U„_ ɪ = U(O).
In this case, we have a complete Siegel formula. Let ωr(x) denote a gauge-
form defined over
к on the homogeneous space Ur and ∣ωr(x)∣4 the cor-
responding measure on
(Ur)λ for r ≠ n. Then, we have

f ( Σ Φ(g<fg)} ∙ dμ(g) = Σ f Φ(x)∙z(P∕(x)<*)∙∣dx∣Λ
jGyl∕Gkξ eXk J           i*ek JXa

n-2 f∙

+ Σ Φ(x)∙ ∣ωr(x)∣Λ

r = O J(Ur-)A

for every Φ in S^(Xa) . It might be amusing to observe that, in the special
case when л = 1, if we identify x with its (l,2)-coefficient, this becomes
the Poisson formula for the adele group
kA (or, the “Thetaformel” in
non adelic form).



More intriguing information

1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with ICDs and Pacemakers
2. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent
3. The name is absent
4. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
8. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005
12. The name is absent
13. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
14. Biologically inspired distributed machine cognition: a new formal approach to hyperparallel computation
15. THE EFFECT OF MARKETING COOPERATIVES ON COST-REDUCING PROCESS INNOVATION ACTIVITY
16. The name is absent
17. The name is absent
18. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent