Table 11: Summary of projection results
|
Scenario I: Increase avg. performance __________O)___________ |
Scenario II: Bring each country to Finish level ______æ_______ |
Scenario III: _____æ______ | |
|
“Endogenous-growth” specification | |||
|
in billion $ |
123,108 |
275,429 |
226,333 |
|
in o∕o of discounted future GDP______ |
___________________6.2o∕o______________________ |
__________________________13.8o∕o___________________________ |
____________________ll,3o∕o_______________________ |
|
“Neoclassical” specification | |||
|
in billion $ |
90,031 |
179,655 |
187,191 |
|
in % of discounted future GDP |
___________________4.3o∕o______________________ |
__________________________8.5o∕o___________________________ |
_____________________8.9o∕o________________________ |
Notes'. Discounted value of future increases in OECD GDP until 2090, expressed in billion $ (PPP) and as percentage of discounted value of all annual projected OECD
GDPs until 2090.
Source: Authors’ calculations.
Table 12: Educational spending and student achievement
PISA 2000 PISA 2003 PISA 2006 FD FE
|
Sample: |
all |
exp>S25,000 |
all |
exp>S25,000 |
all |
exp>S25,000 |
all |
all |
|
(ɪ) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(?) |
(8) | |
|
Expenditure per student |
1.079 |
0.069 |
0.670 |
0.203 |
0.697 |
0.097 |
-0.260 |
-0.125 |
|
(2.76) |
(0-13) |
(2.06) |
(0.58) |
(2.70) |
(0.33) |
(0.44) |
(0.35) | |
|
No. of countries |
24 |
19 |
26 |
23 |
28 |
25 |
23 |
29 (78) |
|
R2 (adj.)____________________ |
0.224 |
-0.058 |
0.114 |
-0.031 |
0.189 |
-0.039 |
-0.038 |
0.027 |
Notes: Dependent variable: PISA math test score. Expenditure per student = cumulative expenditure on educational institutions per student between age 6 and 15,
measured in 1,000 US dollars, converted by purchasing power parities. Sample: all = all OECD countries with available data; exp>S25,000 = countries with cumulative
expenditure per student above $25,000. FD = fist differences, 2006-2000. FE = fixed effects, pooling all three PISA tests, model contains time dummies (A2 of FE model
refers to within/?2), /-statistics in parentheses.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2003, 2004, 2007).
More intriguing information
1. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: THE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY AGENDA2. Aktive Klienten - Aktive Politik? (Wie) Läßt sich dauerhafte Unabhängigkeit von Sozialhilfe erreichen? Ein Literaturbericht
3. The name is absent
4. Education Responses to Climate Change and Quality: Two Parts of the Same Agenda?
5. Feature type effects in semantic memory: An event related potentials study
6. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
7. HEDONIC PRICES IN THE MALTING BARLEY MARKET
8. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
9. FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS
10. The name is absent