Table 11: Summary of projection results
|
Scenario I: Increase avg. performance __________O)___________ |
Scenario II: Bring each country to Finish level ______æ_______ |
Scenario III: _____æ______ | |
|
“Endogenous-growth” specification | |||
|
in billion $ |
123,108 |
275,429 |
226,333 |
|
in o∕o of discounted future GDP______ |
___________________6.2o∕o______________________ |
__________________________13.8o∕o___________________________ |
____________________ll,3o∕o_______________________ |
|
“Neoclassical” specification | |||
|
in billion $ |
90,031 |
179,655 |
187,191 |
|
in % of discounted future GDP |
___________________4.3o∕o______________________ |
__________________________8.5o∕o___________________________ |
_____________________8.9o∕o________________________ |
Notes'. Discounted value of future increases in OECD GDP until 2090, expressed in billion $ (PPP) and as percentage of discounted value of all annual projected OECD
GDPs until 2090.
Source: Authors’ calculations.
Table 12: Educational spending and student achievement
PISA 2000 PISA 2003 PISA 2006 FD FE
|
Sample: |
all |
exp>S25,000 |
all |
exp>S25,000 |
all |
exp>S25,000 |
all |
all |
|
(ɪ) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(?) |
(8) | |
|
Expenditure per student |
1.079 |
0.069 |
0.670 |
0.203 |
0.697 |
0.097 |
-0.260 |
-0.125 |
|
(2.76) |
(0-13) |
(2.06) |
(0.58) |
(2.70) |
(0.33) |
(0.44) |
(0.35) | |
|
No. of countries |
24 |
19 |
26 |
23 |
28 |
25 |
23 |
29 (78) |
|
R2 (adj.)____________________ |
0.224 |
-0.058 |
0.114 |
-0.031 |
0.189 |
-0.039 |
-0.038 |
0.027 |
Notes: Dependent variable: PISA math test score. Expenditure per student = cumulative expenditure on educational institutions per student between age 6 and 15,
measured in 1,000 US dollars, converted by purchasing power parities. Sample: all = all OECD countries with available data; exp>S25,000 = countries with cumulative
expenditure per student above $25,000. FD = fist differences, 2006-2000. FE = fixed effects, pooling all three PISA tests, model contains time dummies (A2 of FE model
refers to within/?2), /-statistics in parentheses.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2003, 2004, 2007).
More intriguing information
1. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach2. DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
3. The name is absent
4. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program
5. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies
6. The name is absent
7. An Empirical Analysis of the Curvature Factor of the Term Structure of Interest Rates
8. Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance
9. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
10. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies