Table 9: Projection results under alternative parameter assumptions on growth coefficients and time horizon_______________________________ | ||||||||||||
Lowest coefficient |
Highest coefficient |
Lower bound confidence |
Upper bound confidence |
Time horizon 2050 |
Time horizon 2150 | |||||||
Bilhon S |
% GDP |
Bilhon S |
% GDP |
BiHion S |
% GDP |
Bilfion S |
% GDP |
Billion S |
% GDP |
Billion S |
% GDP | |
(ɪ) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
P) |
(8) |
(9) |
(ɪθ) |
(11) |
(12) | |
Australia |
1,548 |
170% |
2,217 |
243% |
1,317 |
144% |
2,899 |
318% |
308 |
34% |
5,805 |
636% |
Austria |
1,128 |
336% |
1,641 |
489% |
954 |
284% |
2,182 |
650% |
219 |
65% |
4,555 |
1,357% |
Belgium |
1,163 |
278% |
1,683 |
402% |
986 |
235% |
2,224 |
531% |
227 |
54% |
4,576 |
1,093% |
Canada |
2,022 |
144% |
2,888 |
206% |
1,722 |
123% |
3,767 |
268% |
404 |
29% |
7,497 |
534% |
Czech Republic |
862 |
299% |
1,249 |
434% |
730 |
254% |
1,655 |
575% |
168 |
58% |
3,423 |
1,189% |
Denmark |
893 |
423% |
1,310 |
621% |
753 |
357% |
1,757 |
833% |
171 |
81% |
3,750 |
1,778% |
Finland |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
France |
8,268 |
364% |
12,065 |
531% |
6,989 |
308% |
16,083 |
708% |
1,596 |
70% |
33,815 |
1,488% |
Germany |
12,519 |
409% |
18,348 |
600% |
10,567 |
346% |
24,569 |
803% |
2,400 |
78% |
52,262 |
1,709% |
Greece |
2,993 |
825% |
4,558 |
1256% |
2,493 |
687% |
6,354 |
1751% |
540 |
149% |
15,071 |
4,153% |
Hungary |
957 |
458% |
1,409 |
674% |
807 |
386% |
1,896 |
907% |
182 |
87% |
4,084 |
1,954% |
Iceland |
48 |
385% |
70 |
563% |
41 |
325% |
94 |
753% |
9 |
74% |
198 |
1,591% |
Ireland |
725 |
357% |
1,057 |
521% |
613 |
302% |
1,409 |
694% |
140 |
69% |
2,957 |
1,457% |
Italy |
13,726 |
717% |
20,702 |
1081% |
11,473 |
599% |
28,562 |
1491% |
2,516 |
131% |
65,827 |
3,436% |
Japan |
2,145 |
47% |
3,034 |
66% |
1,833 |
40% |
3,920 |
85% |
436 |
9% |
7,618 |
165% |
Korea, Rep. |
565 |
40% |
799 |
56% |
483 |
34% |
1,031 |
72% |
115 |
8% |
2,000 |
140% |
Luxembourg |
299 |
685% |
450 |
1030% |
250 |
573% |
619 |
1417% |
55 |
126% |
1,415 |
3,238% |
Mexico |
26,267 |
1594% |
42,714 |
2593% |
21,416 |
1300% |
63,912 |
3879% |
4,306 |
261% |
186,466 |
11,318% |
Netherlands |
996 |
141% |
1,423 |
202% |
849 |
120% |
1,855 |
263% |
199 |
28% |
3,689 |
524% |
New Zealand |
204 |
163% |
292 |
233% |
173 |
139% |
381 |
305% |
41 |
32% |
762 |
610% |
Norway |
1,425 |
487% |
2,104 |
719% |
1,200 |
410% |
2,839 |
971% |
270 |
92% |
6,162 |
2,107% |
Poland |
3,829 |
521% |
5,672 |
772% |
3,221 |
438% |
7,679 |
1045% |
722 |
98% |
16,813 |
2,289% |
Portugal |
2,018 |
785% |
3,063 |
1191% |
1,684 |
655% |
4,254 |
1654% |
366 |
142% |
9,983 |
3,882% |
Slovak Repubhc |
568 |
477% |
838 |
704% |
478 |
402% |
1,130 |
949% |
108 |
91% |
2,445 |
2,054% |
Spain |
8,845 |
568% |
13,158 |
844% |
7,428 |
477% |
17,893 |
1148% |
1,656 |
106% |
39,653 |
2,544% |
Sweden |
1,285 |
343% |
1,872 |
500% |
1,087 |
290% |
2,490 |
665% |
249 |
66% |
5,208 |
1,391% |
Switzerland |
852 |
245% |
1,229 |
353% |
723 |
208% |
1,619 |
466% |
168 |
48% |
3,304 |
950% |
Turkey |
13,273 |
1258% |
20,994 |
1990% |
10,920 |
1035% |
30,478 |
2889% |
2,265 |
215% |
81,227 |
7,700% |
United Kingdom |
5,804 |
244% |
8,372 |
352% |
4,926 |
207% |
11,029 |
464% |
1,141 |
48% |
22,498 |
946% |
United States |
80,503 |
530% |
119,336 |
785% |
67,686 |
445% |
161,693 |
1064% |
15,155 |
100% |
354,821 |
2,335% |
OECD_______ |
195,731 |
459% |
294,547 |
690% |
163,804 |
384% |
406,270 |
952% |
36,131 |
85% |
947,885 |
2,221% |
Notes'. Scenario II: Bring each country to Finish level of 546 points on PISA. Discounted value of future increases in GDP until 2090, expressed |
in billion $ (PPP) and | |||||||||||
as percentage of current GDP. | ||||||||||||
Source: Authors’ |
calculations. | |||||||||||
Table 10: Projection results under alternative parameter assumptions on reform duration, working life |
and discount rate | |||||||||||
10-year reform |
30-year reform |
Working Hfe 35 years |
Discount rate 2.5% |
Discomt rate 3.5% |
Disc, rate Stem Report | |||||||
Bilhon S |
% GDP |
Bilhon S |
% GDP |
BiHion S |
% GDP |
Billion S |
% GDP |
Billion S |
% GDP |
Billion S |
% GDP | |
(ɪ) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
P) |
(8) |
(9) |
(ɪθ) |
(11) |
(12) | |
AustraHa |
2,541 |
279% |
1,721 |
189% |
2,287 |
251% |
2,788 |
306% |
1,581 |
173% |
4,763 |
522% |
Austria |
1,887 |
562% |
1,263 |
376% |
1,694 |
504% |
2,062 |
614% |
1,165 |
347% |
3,533 |
1,052% |
Belgium |
1,933 |
462% |
1,299 |
310% |
1,736 |
415% |
2,115 |
505% |
1,197 |
286% |
3,621 |
865% |
Canada |
3,310 |
236% |
2,246 |
160% |
2,980 |
212% |
3,633 |
259% |
2,062 |
147% |
6,204 |
442% |
Czech Repubhc |
1,435 |
499% |
963 |
335% |
1,289 |
448% |
1,570 |
545% |
888 |
309% |
2,689 |
934% |
Denmark |
1,508 |
715% |
1,004 |
476% |
1,352 |
641% |
1,645 |
780% |
928 |
440% |
2,823 |
1,338% |
Finland |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
France |
13,875 |
610% |
9,272 |
408% |
12,449 |
548% |
15,152 |
667% |
8,559 |
377% |
25,981 |
1,143% |
Germany |
21,116 |
691% |
14,067 |
460% |
18,934 |
619% |
23,034 |
753% |
13,000 |
425% |
39,530 |
1,293% |
Greece |
5,279 |
1455% |
3,421 |
943% |
4,705 |
1296% |
5,703 |
1572% |
3,193 |
880% |
9,855 |
2,716% |
Hungary |
1,623 |
777% |
1,078 |
516% |
1,454 |
696% |
1,768 |
846% |
997 |
477% |
3,037 |
1,453% |
Iceland |
81 |
648% |
54 |
432% |
72 |
581% |
88 |
707% |
50 |
399% |
151 |
1,213% |
Ireland |
1,216 |
599% |
813 |
401% |
1,091 |
538% |
1,328 |
654% |
750 |
370% |
2,277 |
1,122% |
Italy |
23,939 |
1250% |
15,624 |
816% |
21,367 |
1115% |
25,926 |
1353% |
14,545 |
759% |
44,724 |
2,335% |
Japan |
3,472 |
75% |
2,372 |
52% |
3,130 |
68% |
3,820 |
83% |
2,173 |
47% |
6,510 |
141% |
Korea, Rep. |
914 |
64% |
625 |
44% |
824 |
58% |
1,005 |
70% |
572 |
40% |
1,713 |
120% |
Luxembourg |
520 |
1191% |
340 |
779% |
465 |
1063% |
564 |
1290% |
317 |
724% |
972 |
2,225% |
Mexico |
50,015 |
3036% |
30,929 |
1877% |
44,093 |
2676% |
53,101 |
3223% |
29,371 |
1783% |
92,736 |
5,629% |
Netherlands |
1,630 |
231% |
1,106 |
157% |
1,468 |
208% |
1,790 |
254% |
1,016 |
144% |
3,056 |
434% |
New Zealand |
334 |
267% |
227 |
181% |
301 |
241% |
367 |
293% |
208 |
166% |
627 |
501% |
Norway |
2,425 |
829% |
1,607 |
549% |
2,172 |
742% |
2,640 |
903% |
1,488 |
509% |
4,537 |
1,551% |
Poland |
6,539 |
890% |
4,323 |
589% |
5,854 |
797% |
7,114 |
969% |
4,006 |
545% |
12,233 |
1,665% |
Portugal |
3,546 |
1379% |
2,304 |
896% |
3,161 |
1229% |
3,834 |
1491% |
2,148 |
835% |
6,621 |
2,575% |
Slovak Repubhc |
965 |
811% |
640 |
538% |
865 |
726% |
1,051 |
883% |
593 |
498% |
1,807 |
1,518% |
Spain |
15,180 |
974% |
10,005 |
642% |
13,579 |
871% |
16,498 |
1059% |
9,282 |
596% |
28,390 |
1,822% |
Sweden |
2,152 |
575% |
1,440 |
385% |
1,931 |
516% |
2,351 |
628% |
1,329 |
355% |
4,030 |
1,076% |
Switzerland |
1,411 |
406% |
951 |
273% |
1,268 |
365% |
1,545 |
444% |
875 |
252% |
2,643 |
760% |
Turkey |
24,470 |
2320% |
15,436 |
1463% |
21,672 |
2055% |
26,174 |
2481% |
14,550 |
1379% |
45,513 |
4,315% |
United Kingdom |
9,609 |
404% |
6,475 |
272% |
8,638 |
363% |
10,523 |
442% |
5,960 |
251% |
18,005 |
757% |
United States |
137,603 |
906% |
90,922 |
598% |
123,157 |
811% |
149,676 |
985% |
84,272 |
555% |
257,402 |
1,694% |
OECD_______ |
340,528 |
798% |
222,527 |
521% |
303,987 |
712% |
368,864 |
864% |
207,075 |
485% |
635,982 |
1,490% |
Notes: Scenario II: Bring each countιy to Finish level of 546 points on PISA. Discounted value of future increases in GDP until 2090, expressed |
in billion $ (PPP) and | |||||||||||
as percentage of current GDP. | ||||||||||||
Source: Authors’ |
calculations. |
More intriguing information
1. Chebyshev polynomial approximation to approximate partial differential equations2. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
3. Sustainability of economic development and governance patterns in water management - an overview on the reorganisation of public utilities in Campania, Italy, under EU Framework Directive in the field of water policy (2000/60/CE)
4. Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!? On the Role of Entrepreneurial Experience for Firm Survival
5. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
6. The name is absent
7. Improvements in medical care and technology and reductions in traffic-related fatalities in Great Britain
8. The name is absent
9. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand
10. The name is absent