The name is absent



1                               14

IV ' = sP = 4[F (V P V P - δ) + 2 £ F (V J V J - δ)]     (3.1)

J=3

Among the terms between square brackets, the first reflects the share of voters in
group
P whose reservation utility is satisfied, and the second the share of satisfied
voters from other groups (
J =3, 4). As the latter split their vote equally between
the two parties in the governing coalition, the second term is multiplied by
1/2.
Finally, since each economic group constitutes one quarter of the population, the
whole expression is pre-multiplied by this number.

As ωi has the same uniform distribution in each group, F(ω) = 2 + φω. Recall
also that the expected value of the popularity shock
δ is zero, at the time policy
is set. After some simplifications, the expected seat share in the next legislature
for party
P reduces to:

E (ιv sP ) = 4 + 4 V P VP ) + 1XX (V J - V J )] .

44       2

(3.2)


J=3

Thus, the expected seat share in the next legislature depends linearly on the
weighted indirect utilities of the voters from
J = P and from the opposition
parties. As mentioned above, the density
φ of the idiosyncratic reservation utilities
measures within-group mobility and hence the response of the expected seat shares
to economic policy. Note that the groups represented by a party in government
receive twice the weight of the groups in the opposition. Finally, whatever the
equilibrium policies at the policy formation stage,
VJ = VJ , by definition of
V J . Equation (3.2) thus immediately implies that the expected equilibrium seat
share in the next legislature for a coalition partner, at the
party formation stage
is
4. Thus, in the expected equilibrium continuation payoff ivWPP, given by (2.4)
above, we will be able to set
E(ivsP) = 1. By the symmetry of the model, the
expected seat share at the party formation stage for a small party in opposition
is exactly the same; i.e., in
ivWP we set E(ivsP) = 1.

What would happen if the opposition instead consisted of a single party? It
is easy to verify that the expressions for the expected vote shares for government
coalition parties at the party formation stage are exactly the same: i.e., we have
E(ivsP) = E(iiisP) = 4 for P = 1, 2. A single opposition party can expect to
capture the remaining votes
E(iiisP) = 2.

13



More intriguing information

1. THE WELFARE EFFECTS OF CONSUMING A CANCER PREVENTION DIET
2. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
3. The name is absent
4. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax
5. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan
6. The name is absent
7. The effect of globalisation on industrial districts in Italy: evidence from the footwear sector
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
11. The name is absent
12. An Attempt to 2
13. Monetary Policy News and Exchange Rate Responses: Do Only Surprises Matter?
14. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
15. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
16. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power
17. The name is absent
18. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
19. The name is absent
20. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey