Table 2a
Party Structure, type of governments and electoral rules
OLS and instrumental variable estimates in 1990s cross section
|
(1) |
(2) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) |
(6) |
(7) |
(8) | |
|
Dep. Var. |
party_frag |
nparties |
coalition |
single |
ngov |
coalition |
single |
ngov |
|
party_frag |
2.01 |
-2.78 | ||||||
|
(0.71)*** |
(0.50)*** | |||||||
|
nparties |
0.25 | |||||||
|
(0.10)** | ||||||||
|
maj |
-0.12 |
-2.10 |
-0.16 |
0.42 |
0.08 | |||
|
(0.05)** |
(1.31) |
(0.23) |
(0.17)** |
(0.85) | ||||
|
semi |
-0.22 |
-3.76 |
0.32 |
-0.28 |
0.98 | |||
|
(0.09)** |
(2.23)* |
(0.22) |
(0.10)*** |
(1.03) | ||||
|
district |
0.11 |
3.20 |
0.66 |
-0.30 |
2.22 | |||
|
(0.07) |
(1.56)** |
(0.26)** |
(0.19) |
(1.15)* | ||||
|
threshold |
0.00 |
-0.39 |
0.03 |
-0.01 |
-0.09 | |||
|
(0.01) |
(0.16)** |
(0.03) |
(0.02) |
(0.12) | ||||
|
bicam |
0.23 |
-0.11 |
0.06 |
0.15 |
-0.01 |
0.28 | ||
|
(0.10)** |
(0.09) |
(0.33) |
(0.11) |
(0.08) |
(0.24) | |||
|
investiture |
-0.16 |
0.95 |
-0.08 |
0.84 | ||||
|
(0.21) |
(0.84) |
(0.12) |
(0.35)** | |||||
|
constructive |
0.47 |
-0.04 |
0.53 |
0.19 | ||||
|
(0.14)*** |
(0.77) |
(0.10)*** |
(0.33) | |||||
|
Over-id |
7.91(3)** |
4.33(3) |
4.52(3) | |||||
|
Estimation |
OLS |
OLS |
OLS |
OLS |
OLS |
2SLS |
2SLS |
2SLS |
|
Adj.R-sq. |
0.47 |
0.44 |
0.39 |
0.51 |
0.22 | |||
|
N. Obs. |
52 |
52 |
47 |
47 |
47 |
47 |
47 |
47 |
Robust standard errors in parentheses; * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%
Controls included in all OLS specifications, cols (1)-(5): avelf, lpop, col_uka
Second-stage variables in 2SLS regressions, cols (6)-(8): avelf, lpop, col_uka, bicam, investiture, constructive
First-stage variables in the 2SLS specifications: maj, semi, district, threshold, and all second-stage variables
Over-id is Hansen’s J test statistic of the over-identifying restriction implied by the electoral rule variables having no direct effect on the type government;
critical values at 5% significance 7.81, cols (6)-( 8)
More intriguing information
1. Geography, Health, and Demo-Economic Development2. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“
3. How we might be able to understand the brain
4. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
5. Financial Development and Sectoral Output Growth in 19th Century Germany
6. The name is absent
7. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation