had 4 terms or more (15% and 16% respectively). Similarly in English, 39% had tutoring for
up to three terms while 13% had 4 terms or more. A substantial proportion of students had
received tutoring before starting their GCSE courses in year 10, ranging from 26% in French
to 56% in humanities (Table 5).
Number of terms of tutoring |
Maths (n=212) |
English (n=114) |
Science (n=74) |
French (n=23) |
Humanities (n=25) |
29 |
19 |
30 |
30 |
24 | |
2-3 |
25 |
20 |
27 |
13 |
20 |
4+ |
15 |
13 |
16 |
31 |
0 |
before year 10 only |
31 |
50 |
27 |
26 |
56 |
Table 5. Duration of tutoring received by year 11 students (percentages)
Family background and the prevalence of tutoring
Relations between the employment of tutors and students’ family background were examined
using information on socio-economic status and ethnicity. Two indicators of socio-economic
status were available: DfES data sets provided individual pupils’ eligibility for free school
meals and information on parents’ education was gathered from the student questionnaires.
Of the pupils eligible for free school meals, 19% had ever had a tutor, as compared with 28%
of pupils who were not eligible (χ2 = 15.2, df = 2, p <.001). In light of these findings, analysis
of variance was used to compare the extent of private tuition in the three year groups, when
16
More intriguing information
1. The Interest Rate-Exchange Rate Link in the Mexican Float2. Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa
3. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Outsourcing, Complementary Innovations and Growth
7. The name is absent
8. Determinants of Household Health Expenditure: Case of Urban Orissa
9. The name is absent
10. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles