government. The government now maximizes the welfare function:

πdA +
∕∙n+
AAh
dB

и (F -
∙.K) dAdB^
(22)
with π and v* defined as in (14) and (15), subject to
F(K,Al) (1 - и) - (1 - au) K = О
(23)
F(K,Aft) (1 - и) - (1 - au) K = F (K*,Aft) (1 - t) - (1 - βt) K* - C(24)
The optimality condition with respect to и is:
∂W ['b+ Ah ['b+ A"
-— = Q = Ud' - U')J J [(F - aK)] dAdB + H'J J [u (Fκ - a) Ku] dAdB
+h ' C (u (f ft -aK η 9~a-) dB
h ' £ (u (fl
., ∂Al∖
aKl) — dB (25)
7 du J
The optimality condition with respect to a is:
∂W
da
Zb+ Ah B++ Ah
I [uK] dAdB + H' I [u (Fκ - a) Ka] dAdB
+( h' ι (F‘- aK' > ■)dB - £ h' (u fl - aKl) ) b'
First, it follows from equation (25) that u > О, a = 1, H' = U' cannot be an
optimum, because
dw =£ h' (u (f (AK'■) - k^) d-A) dB = 0 (27)
Second, u has to be greater than zero to satisfy Д^" = 0. This can be explained
as follows: The first term on the RHS of equation (25) is strictly positive, the
three other terms are strictly negative. Therefore, u = 0 and u < 0 are no possible
solutions.
Can u > 0, a = 1, H' > U' be an optimum?
12
More intriguing information
1. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal2. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
3. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
4. The name is absent
5. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
6. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence
7. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties
8. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
9. The name is absent
10. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE