Effort and Performance in Public-Policy Contests



be unambiguously interpreted as a more restrained or a less restrained government
intervention. In these cases the effect of a change in
I on the stakes-asymmetry
depends on the relationship between the elasticities of the stakes with respect to
I.

ηL

Specifically, the effect of a change in I on nLnH depends on whether--- is greater

ηH

nj I

or smaller than 1, where η =— --, j = L, H. In a type (iv) reform the asymmetry

jI nj

ηL

in the stakes is positively related to a change in I if ---<1. In a type (v) reform the

ηH

ηL
asymmetry in the stakes is positively related to a change in I if —>1.

ηH

Usually, a change in public policy affects the stakes of the two contestants. The
applicability of the corresponding reforms of type (i), (iv) and (v) is illustrated by the
following examples.

Monopoly price regulation: Several authors have pointed out that consumers oppose
government protection of a monopoly in attempting to defend their surplus, Baik
(1999), Ellingsen (1991), Fabella (1995). The government is assumed to make a
binary decision: regulating the monopoly or not, that is, force the firm to charge the
competitive price or let it charge the profit-maximizing monopoly price. In this
example therefore the firm is the
LB player and the consumers’ representative is the
HB player. A change in the proposed price positively affects the stakes of both
players, provided that the monopoly price ranges between the competitive price and
the profit-maximizing monopoly price. Under this example the reform is of type (iv).
If the monopoly price is restricted to the range of prices exceeding the profit-
maximizing monopoly price, then a change in price inversely affects the firm’s stake
and positively affects the consumers’ stake. In such a case the example of monopoly
price regulation is a type (i) reform where
i=H.

Public-Good Provision: The government considers building a park on the border of a
residential neighborhood. In order to finance the project, a general tax is levied on all
residents of the country who may benefit from the provision of the proposed park. In
addition to the tax, the local residents, the individuals who reside close to the park, are
subjected to another “tax”: the negative externalities (increased congestion, noise,
etc.) associated with living close to a public park that attracts a large number of



More intriguing information

1. Giant intra-abdominal hydatid cysts with multivisceral locations
2. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
3. A MARKOVIAN APPROXIMATED SOLUTION TO A PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
4. The name is absent
5. Skill and work experience in the European knowledge economy
6. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
7. Computing optimal sampling designs for two-stage studies
8. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.
12. 101 Proposals to reform the Stability and Growth Pact. Why so many? A Survey
13. PRIORITIES IN THE CHANGING WORLD OF AGRICULTURE
14. Surveying the welfare state: challenges, policy development and causes of resilience
15. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
16. The name is absent
17. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
18. An alternative way to model merit good arguments
19. An Intertemporal Benchmark Model for Turkey’s Current Account
20. DISCUSSION: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES