Effort and Performance in Public-Policy Contests



(7)


x * i
~iΓ^


ni


i2 Pri iPrj inj      i2 Prj iPri ini

ixiixj ixj iI     j ixj2 ixi iI


( ∂2 Prj 2 Pr.    2 Pr. 2 Prj

i- i

x 2 x.2    x i x x i x

j     .      .j   .j


.j, .,j=L,H


Rewriting (7) together with (5), we obtain the fundamental equation that generates all
the comparative statics results:

(8)


x*.
I


ɪ ∂2 Pri

B xi x

.j


ηjn.


12Prj

B xj 2


η. nj


.j, .,j=L,H


where B =I n. n


i Pr

I dx j


2 Pr.
x.2


i Pr i Pr Ï

x i ∂x. ∂x i ∂x.

i j i j J


and all second-order partial


derivatives are computed at the Nash equilibrium (x *H , x*L) . The first term in (8)

represents the strategic rival’s-stake (“substitution”) effect. The sign of this term is
2 Pr.

equal to the sign of------η j. The second term represents the own-stake ( income )

x. x

.j

effect. The sign of this term is equal to the sign of η . . By assumption,

2 Pr. (x. , x )

----i±÷j < 0 and, by (2),

x. 2


i 2 Pr-(xi, xj )
x. x j


12Prj(xj, xi)
x. x j


< 0 . Hence, B>0.


A. . Public Policy, Efforts and Winning Probabilities

When a change inI only affects the stake of one of the contestants, as in reforms type
(ii) and (iii),
η . or η j is equal to zero and (8) reduces to

(8’)


x*.
I


( ∂ 2Pri      ï

--------η j ni

x i x,
ij


or


x*i
I


2 Prj
xj2


ï
η
i nj ïï

J


ij, i,j=L,H


In these cases the change in player i’s effort corresponding to the change in nj is
equal to the strategic rival’s-stake (“substitution”) effect, when
ij, or to the strategic

11



More intriguing information

1. Expectations, money, and the forecasting of inflation
2. Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance
3. The name is absent
4. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR
5. he Effect of Phosphorylation on the Electron Capture Dissociation of Peptide Ions
6. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power
7. The name is absent
8. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON VIRGINIA DAIRY FARMS
9. THE USE OF EXTRANEOUS INFORMATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A POLICY SIMULATION MODEL
10. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?