Effort and Performance in Public-Policy Contests



own-stake (“income”) effect, when i=j. The former effect is ambiguous, depending
on the sign of the cross-partial derivative of the contest success function. The latter
effect is clear-cut, due to our assumption that the marginal winning probability of a
contestant is declining in his own effort.

In case (ii) with i=H and case (iii) with i=L,

*

xH   1(


2 PrL


I B


I   ∂Xl 2


Ï
η
h nL

J


and


x * L
I


BI x j ∂x„

LH


ηn

HL


In cases (iii) with i=H and case (ii) with i=L,

I


P-

√'x H dx L


ηn

LH


and


I


2 PrH

2HηL
xH


λ

nH

J


We therefore obtain

Proposition 1:

In case (ii) with i=H and case (iii) with i=L,

x *


L          2 Pr

l- )=Sign ( —--L-ηH ).

x x

LH


x *

Sigπ(      )Sigπ (ηh ) and Sign(

I

In cases (iii) with i=H and case (ii) with i=L,

*     *2

Sign(      )Sign (ηL ) and Sign(--^)=Sign (     ” ηL ).

I                      I         x x

HL

Proposition 1 directly yields the following general comparative statics result that
focuses on the sensitivity of a contestant’s effort to a change in his or his rival’s stake:

H 1 1   ∂ x * H

Corollary 1.1: -----

dnH

> 0,

∂ x * L
nL

> 0,

x *H

Sign (—--

nL

2 P-

) = Sign ( —ʒɪ )

x x

HL

and

Sign(

∂ x * L )

2 Pr

= Sign ( —-L- ).

nH          xL xH

By this first corollary, under our general contest success function, the effort exerted
by a contestant is positively related to his stake. That is, the strategic own-stake
(“income”) effect is always positive (effort of every player is a “normal good”). In
contrast, the effort exerted by a player can be positively or negatively related to the
stake of his rival. It can also be independent of the rival’s stake. When the marginal

12



More intriguing information

1. he Effect of Phosphorylation on the Electron Capture Dissociation of Peptide Ions
2. Locke's theory of perception
3. The name is absent
4. Qualification-Mismatch and Long-Term Unemployment in a Growth-Matching Model
5. Co-ordinating European sectoral policies against the background of European Spatial Development
6. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights
7. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
8. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
9. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
10. The name is absent