Table 7. Shifts from wage earner to owner of small business and shift from self-employment
and closely held firm to widely held firm. Percentage of “shifters” for combinations of
period t-1 and period t quintiles. Yearly transitions, 1993-1994, 1997-1998, and 2002-
2003.
|
Transitions 1993-1994 | |||||||||||||
|
From wage earner to owner of small business (13,524 obs) |
From self-employment and closely held firm to | ||||||||||||
|
From |
To quintile |
From |
To quintile | ||||||||||
|
quintile |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
quintile - |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
|
1 |
19.5 |
4.6 |
2.1 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
29.5 |
1 |
6.9 |
2.8 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.6 |
13.6 |
|
2 |
4.9 |
5.5 |
3.2 |
2.0 |
1.4 |
17.1 |
2 |
1.8 |
3.8 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
0.6 |
9.7 |
|
3 |
2.1 |
2.8 |
4.9 |
3.4 |
1.7 |
14.8 |
3 |
1.1 |
2.8 |
4.2 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
12.8 |
|
4 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
2.6 |
6.5 |
4.4 |
15.7 |
4 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
2.7 |
7.3 |
5.2 |
17.0 |
|
5 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
18.0 |
22.9 |
5 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
2.2 |
4.8 |
37.4 |
46.9 |
|
Total |
28.1 |
14.7 |
13.7 |
16.4 |
27.2 |
100.0 |
Total |
11.8 |
11.6 |
12.2 |
18.0 |
46.5 |
100.0 |
Transitions 1998-1999
|
From wage earner to owner of small business |
From self-employment and closely held firm to | ||||||||||||
|
(14,398 obs) | |||||||||||||
|
From |
To quintile |
From |
To quintile | ||||||||||
|
quintile |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
quintile |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
|
1 |
17.4 |
4.2 |
2.3 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
26.2 |
1 |
4.6 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
9.6 |
|
2 |
4.1 |
5.6 |
3.3 |
2.0 |
1.1 |
16.1 |
2 |
1.6 |
2.8 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
8.5 |
|
3 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
5.6 |
4.0 |
1.5 |
15.3 |
3 |
1.2 |
1.9 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
1.6 |
10.1 |
|
4 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
3.1 |
8.4 |
4.5 |
18.1 |
4 |
0.8 |
1.3 |
2.4 |
7.0 |
5.3 |
16.8 |
|
5 |
0.9 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
2.8 |
19.4 |
24.3 |
5 |
2.7 |
1.5 |
2.8 |
7.1 |
40.9 |
55.0 |
|
Total |
25.2 |
13.7 |
15.2 |
18.5 |
27.5 |
100.0 |
Total |
10.9 |
9.2 |
11.1 |
19.2 |
49.7 |
100.0 |
Transitions 2002-2003
|
From wage earner to owner of small business |
From self-employment and closely held firm to | ||||||||||||
|
From |
To quintile |
From |
To quintile | ||||||||||
|
quintile |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
quintile |
Total | |||||
|
1 |
15.9 |
3.9 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
24.3 |
1 |
6.2 |
2.3 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
2.1 |
12.9 |
|
2 |
4.0 |
5.2 |
3.5 |
1.8 |
0.9 |
15.4 |
2 |
1.8 |
3.3 |
2.2 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
9.5 |
|
3 |
1.9 |
2.6 |
6.0 |
4.5 |
1.6 |
16.6 |
3 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
3.3 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
10.7 |
|
4 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
2.7 |
8.0 |
4.8 |
18.5 |
4 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
2.5 |
5.4 |
5.2 |
15.5 |
|
5 |
1.2 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
3.0 |
19.5 |
25.2 |
5 |
2.5 |
1.5 |
2.6 |
6.7 |
38.1 |
51.4 |
|
Total |
24.6 |
13.8 |
15.0 |
18.6 |
28.0 |
100.0 |
Total |
13.1 |
9.9 |
11.7 |
16.6 |
48.7 |
100.0 |
17
More intriguing information
1. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector2. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics
3. Imitation in location choice
4. The name is absent
5. Migrant Business Networks and FDI
6. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Foreign direct investment in the Indian telecommunications sector
10. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement