Table 7. Shifts from wage earner to owner of small business and shift from self-employment
and closely held firm to widely held firm. Percentage of “shifters” for combinations of
period t-1 and period t quintiles. Yearly transitions, 1993-1994, 1997-1998, and 2002-
2003.
Transitions 1993-1994 | |||||||||||||
From wage earner to owner of small business (13,524 obs) |
From self-employment and closely held firm to | ||||||||||||
From |
To quintile |
From |
To quintile | ||||||||||
quintile |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
quintile - |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
1 |
19.5 |
4.6 |
2.1 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
29.5 |
1 |
6.9 |
2.8 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
1.6 |
13.6 |
2 |
4.9 |
5.5 |
3.2 |
2.0 |
1.4 |
17.1 |
2 |
1.8 |
3.8 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
0.6 |
9.7 |
3 |
2.1 |
2.8 |
4.9 |
3.4 |
1.7 |
14.8 |
3 |
1.1 |
2.8 |
4.2 |
3.2 |
1.6 |
12.8 |
4 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
2.6 |
6.5 |
4.4 |
15.7 |
4 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
2.7 |
7.3 |
5.2 |
17.0 |
5 |
0.7 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
2.8 |
18.0 |
22.9 |
5 |
1.3 |
1.2 |
2.2 |
4.8 |
37.4 |
46.9 |
Total |
28.1 |
14.7 |
13.7 |
16.4 |
27.2 |
100.0 |
Total |
11.8 |
11.6 |
12.2 |
18.0 |
46.5 |
100.0 |
Transitions 1998-1999
From wage earner to owner of small business |
From self-employment and closely held firm to | ||||||||||||
(14,398 obs) | |||||||||||||
From |
To quintile |
From |
To quintile | ||||||||||
quintile |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
quintile |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
1 |
17.4 |
4.2 |
2.3 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
26.2 |
1 |
4.6 |
1.7 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.1 |
9.6 |
2 |
4.1 |
5.6 |
3.3 |
2.0 |
1.1 |
16.1 |
2 |
1.6 |
2.8 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
8.5 |
3 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
5.6 |
4.0 |
1.5 |
15.3 |
3 |
1.2 |
1.9 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
1.6 |
10.1 |
4 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
3.1 |
8.4 |
4.5 |
18.1 |
4 |
0.8 |
1.3 |
2.4 |
7.0 |
5.3 |
16.8 |
5 |
0.9 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
2.8 |
19.4 |
24.3 |
5 |
2.7 |
1.5 |
2.8 |
7.1 |
40.9 |
55.0 |
Total |
25.2 |
13.7 |
15.2 |
18.5 |
27.5 |
100.0 |
Total |
10.9 |
9.2 |
11.1 |
19.2 |
49.7 |
100.0 |
Transitions 2002-2003
From wage earner to owner of small business |
From self-employment and closely held firm to | ||||||||||||
From |
To quintile |
From |
To quintile | ||||||||||
quintile |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Total |
quintile |
Total | |||||
1 |
15.9 |
3.9 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
24.3 |
1 |
6.2 |
2.3 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
2.1 |
12.9 |
2 |
4.0 |
5.2 |
3.5 |
1.8 |
0.9 |
15.4 |
2 |
1.8 |
3.3 |
2.2 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
9.5 |
3 |
1.9 |
2.6 |
6.0 |
4.5 |
1.6 |
16.6 |
3 |
1.4 |
1.6 |
3.3 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
10.7 |
4 |
1.6 |
1.5 |
2.7 |
8.0 |
4.8 |
18.5 |
4 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
2.5 |
5.4 |
5.2 |
15.5 |
5 |
1.2 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
3.0 |
19.5 |
25.2 |
5 |
2.5 |
1.5 |
2.6 |
6.7 |
38.1 |
51.4 |
Total |
24.6 |
13.8 |
15.0 |
18.6 |
28.0 |
100.0 |
Total |
13.1 |
9.9 |
11.7 |
16.6 |
48.7 |
100.0 |
17
More intriguing information
1. THE MEXICAN HOG INDUSTRY: MOVING BEYOND 20032. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
3. MATHEMATICS AS AN EXACT AND PRECISE LANGUAGE OF NATURE
4. The Interest Rate-Exchange Rate Link in the Mexican Float
5. Artificial neural networks as models of stimulus control*
6. Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach
7. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
8. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
9. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS
10. The name is absent