Table 10. Relationship between upward mobility and business ownership. Results for marginal
effects based on random effects probit estimations of yearly transitions, for two
definitions of owners of small businesses. Quintile and decile specifications, standard
errors in parentheses
|
Quintile specification |
Decile specification | |||
|
Owners of small |
Owners of small |
Owners of small |
Owners of small | |
|
Ownership of small |
0.033 (3.4×10-4) |
0.038 (3.4×10-4) |
0.013 (1.6×10-4) |
0.016 (1.7×10-4) |
|
Age |
-2.0×10-4 (1.0×10-5) |
-2.0×10-4 |
3.7×10-5 |
3.7×10-5 |
|
Male |
0.029 (1.7×10-4) |
0.028 (1.7×10-4) |
0.009 (7.0×10-5) |
0.008 (7.0×10-5) |
|
Married |
-0.006 (1.2×10-4) |
-0.006 (1.2×10-4) |
-3.3×10-4 (4.0×10-5) |
-3.8×10-4 |
|
Dummy for children |
0.011 (1.0×10-4) |
0.011 (1.0×10-4) |
0.002 (3.0×10-5) |
0.002 (3.0×10-5) |
|
Urban areas |
0.011 (1.5×10-4) |
0.011 (1.5×10-4) |
0.004 (5.0×10-5) |
0.004 (5.0×10-5) |
|
Not born W-Europe, |
-0.006 (2.4×10-4) |
-0.006 (2.4×10-4) |
-0.002 (6.0×10-5) |
-0.002 (6.0×10-5) |
|
Length of education |
0.005 (3.0×10-5) |
0.005 (3.0×10-5) |
0.001 (1.0×10-5) |
0.001 (1.0×10-5) |
|
General progr. |
0.003 (3.3×10-4) |
0.003 (3.3×10-4) |
0.002 (1.3×10-4) |
0.002 (1.3×10-4) |
|
Humanities and arts |
2.0×10-5 |
-3.9×10-5 (2.8×10-4) |
3.6×10-4 |
3.2×10-4 |
|
Teacher training and |
-0.009 (1.7×10-4) |
-0.009 (1.7×10-4) |
-0.002 (5.0×10-5) |
-0.002 (5.0×10-5) |
|
Social sciences and |
-0.007 (1.9×10-4) |
-0.007 (2.0×10-4) |
-0.002 (6.0×10-5) |
-0.002 (6.0×10-5) |
|
Business and |
0.006 (3.4×10-4) |
0.005 (3.3×10-4) |
0.003 (1.4×10-4) |
0.003 (1.3×10-4) |
|
Natural sciences |
0.002 (2.8×10-4) |
0.002 (2.8×10-4) |
7.7×10-4 (1.0×10-4) |
7.4×10-4 |
|
Health, welfare and |
-0.003 (2.5×10-4) |
-0.003 (2.5×10-4) |
-1.5×10-4 |
-1.3×10-4 |
|
Primary industries |
-0.002 (2.7×10-5) |
-0.002 (2.7×10-5) |
-1.0×10-4 |
-1.2×10-4 |
|
Transport and |
0.002 (3.3×10-5) |
0.002 (3.3×10-5) |
7.5×10-4 |
7.4×10-4 |
|
Rho |
0.453 (0.001) |
0.446 (0.001) |
0.449 (0.002) |
0.463 (0.001) |
|
LR-test of rho=0 |
Prob>=0.000 |
Prob>=0.000 |
Prob>=0.000 |
Prob>=0.000 |
24
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Environmental Regulation, Market Power and Price Discrimination in the Agricultural Chemical Industry
3. Announcement effects of convertible bond loans versus warrant-bond loans: An empirical analysis for the Dutch market
4. Target Acquisition in Multiscale Electronic Worlds
5. A Regional Core, Adjacent, Periphery Model for National Economic Geography Analysis
6. HEDONIC PRICES IN THE MALTING BARLEY MARKET
7. The name is absent
8. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
9. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
10. The name is absent