27
A4.1 WTτ = T∫Fτ(s,τ)e-rsds
0
F- ( T ,τ) r
T 1 - e -rT
∫Fτ (s,τ)e-rs ds
0
• Temporal Independence: FτT = 0 ⇒ TτH = 0
Proof. If FτT = 0 , equation [10] reduces to
WTτ = Fτ(T,τ) - (1 -e-rT )-1 [Fτ(0,τ) - Fτ(T,τ)e-rT ]. There are two possibilities.
If
Fτ = 0, then trivially WTτ = 0 . Under Fτ ≠ 0, FτT = 0 implies that
[Fτ(0,τ)-Fτ(T,τ)e-rT]=Fτ(1-e-rT)⇒
WTτ =Fτ(T,τ)-(1-e-rT)-1Fτ(T,τ)(1-e-rT)=0. Hence, TτH =0.
• Increasing Temporal Dependence: FτT > 0 ⇒ TτH > 0
F (T τ) r
Proof. i) Assume that F, > 0 ⇒ Wt, > 0 ⇔ ------------>----—
τ Tτ T - rT
∫1-e
Fτ (s,τ)e-rsds
0
FτT > 0 ⇒
T∫Fτ(T,τ)e-rsds
0
T
> ∫Fτ (s,τ)e -rs ds ⇔
0
F- (T ,τ )(1 - e —rT )
r
> T∫Fτ(s,τ)e-rsds
0
F (T τ) r
⇔ ----τ-(-^-)--->------ . Hence, WTτ > 0 so that TH > 0.
T 1 - e-rT Tτ τ
∫Fτ (s,τ)e-rsds
0
F (T τ) r
ii) Assume thatF, < 0 ⇒ Wt < 0 ⇔ ----τ-------<-----—
τ Tτ T 1 - e-rT
∫Fτ (s,τ)e-rs ds
0
FτT > 0 ⇒
T∫Fτ(T,τ)e-rsds
0
T
> ∫Fτ (s, τ)e -rs ds ⇔
0
F- (T ,τ )(1 - e -rT )
r
> T∫Fτ(s,τ)e-rsds
0
F (T τ) r
⇔ τ------------<-----—. Hence, WTτ > 0 so that TH > 0.
T -rT Tτ τ
∫1-e
Fτ (s,τ)e-rsds
0
More intriguing information
1. Spectral calibration of exponential Lévy Models [1]2. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?
3. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
4. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
5. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
6. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
10. A model-free approach to delta hedging