Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence



26


-⅛E yields (1 - e~rT )sF(s, τ)e-rsds = TE - E, so that
0

—E = - Te ~rT (1 - e ~rT ) -1E - TE + E = Ed, where d = (1 + r - rT - rT ( erT -1)-1 ) =
dr


(1 + r)(e -1) -rTe

rT 1              '

er -1
numerator and the


To apply the L’Hopital’s rule for d, we differentiate its


denominator with respect to rT and get


(1 + r)erT -erT
d = -------—

erT


- rTe rT                             (1 + r) - 1

------- which gives that lim d =--------= r > 0 . Hence, we
rT0         1


have - (E +rE) = = E[1 +r -rT - rT(e rT -1)-1]< 0. Now the overall term


rT                        rT

B1 =-(1 -      )( pf (T ) + V ) - (1 + r - rT - -r- ) E < 0, so that T1H

er -1                               er -1


<0. Q.E.D.


Appendix 3. Proof of Lemma 2:


Note first that we can write


A.3.1. F(T,τ) -rE =


T

F(s,τ)e-rsds

0

F (T ,τ )

T

F(s,τ)e-rsds

r

(1-e-rT)


TT

If FT > () 0, then F(T,τ)e -rs ds > ()F(s,τ)e-rsds

00

FT"(1 -e-rT)>()F(s,τ)e-rsds T  f(Tτ)    >()    r-rT)

0                     F(s, τ)e-rsds       ( e )

0

Hence, F(T,τ)-rE > () 0 as FT(T,τ) > () 0. Q.E.D.

Appendix 4. Proof of the Theorem: the sign of TτH = the sign of FτT

Recall from the text that the cross-derivative of equation [9] can be written as



More intriguing information

1. Tobacco and Alcohol: Complements or Substitutes? - A Statistical Guinea Pig Approach
2. The Complexity Era in Economics
3. The name is absent
4. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
5. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1
6. The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent