Aggregate Wage Flexibility in Selected New EU Member States 17
Table 5: Cointegration and Error Correction
__________________Czech Republic________________ |
Estonia_________________________ | |||||
Cointegrating Eq. |
CointEq1 |
CointEq1 | ||||
WR(-1) |
1 |
1 | ||||
PROD(-1) |
-1.576 *** |
-0.953 *** | ||||
-(0.104) |
-(0.024) | |||||
UR_STD(-1) |
-0.014 |
0.127 *** | ||||
-(0.024) |
-(0.031) | |||||
C_________________ |
0.011 |
-0.249 | ||||
Error Correction |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
CointEql |
-0.061 |
0.063 |
0.733 *** |
-0.347 *** |
0.283 *** |
0.049 |
-(0.116) |
-(0.079) |
-(0.240) |
-(0.129) |
-(0.097) |
-(0.338) | |
D(WR(-1)) |
0.022 |
-0.002 |
-0.254 |
-0.032 |
-0.167 |
0.043 |
-(0.185) |
-(0.126) |
-(0.385) |
-(0.151) |
-(0.114) |
-(0.396) | |
D(PROD(-1)) |
0.247 |
0.176 |
-0.508 |
-0.054 |
0.049 |
-0.622 |
-(0.290) |
-(0.197) |
-(0.602) |
-(0.181) |
-(0.137) |
-(0.476) | |
D(UR(-1)) |
-0.076 |
-0.031 |
0.542 *** |
0.016 |
-0.087 |
0.667 *** |
-(0.059) |
-(0.040) |
-(0.122) |
-(0.070) |
-(0.053) |
-(0.184) | |
C |
0.010 *** |
0.006 *** |
0.014 *** |
0.015 *** |
0.019 *** |
0.006 |
-(0.003) |
-(0.002) |
-(0.006) |
-(0.004) |
-(0.003) |
-(0.011) | |
Sample: |
1995:1 - 2004:4 |
1995:1 - 2004:4 | ||||
Nobs: |
40 |
40 | ||||
R-squared |
0.186 |
0.039 |
0.750 |
0.248 |
0.201 |
0.367 |
Adj. R-squared_________ |
0.093 |
-0.070 |
0.721 |
0.162 |
0.110 |
0.294 |
Hungary |
Lithuania | |||||
Cointegrating Eq. |
CointEq1 |
CointEq1 | ||||
WR(-1) |
1 |
1 | ||||
PROD(-1) |
-1.967 *** |
-0.618 *** | ||||
-(0.347) |
-(0.051) | |||||
UR_STD(-1) |
-0.254 |
0.005 | ||||
-(0.132) |
-(0.031) | |||||
C_________________ |
0.674 |
0.102 | ||||
Error Correction |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
CointEq1 |
-0.271 *** |
0.057 |
0.122 |
-0.394 *** |
0.092 |
0.405 |
-(0.089) |
-(0.049) |
-(0.192) |
-(0.102) |
-(0.107) |
-(0.324) | |
D(WR(-1)) |
0.040 |
0.005 |
0.194 |
0.352 *** |
0.221 |
0.223 |
-(0.140) |
-(0.077) |
-(0.302) |
-(0.128) |
-(0.135) |
-(0.408) | |
D(PROD(-1)) |
-0.407 |
0.220 |
-0.019 |
-0.229 |
-0.301 * |
0.362 |
-(0.348) |
-(0.192) |
-(0.751) |
-(0.152) |
-(0.160) |
-(0.484) | |
D(UR(-1)) |
0.008 |
0.018 |
0.191 |
0.029 |
-0.009 |
0.583 *** |
-(0.083) |
-(0.046) |
-(0.180) |
-(0.047) |
-(0.050) |
-(0.151) | |
C |
0.011 *** |
0.006 *** |
-0.010 *** |
0.008 ** |
0.021 *** |
-0.011 |
-(0.004) |
-(0.002) |
-(0.009) |
-(0.004) |
-(0.004) |
-(0.013) | |
Sample: |
1995:1 - 2004:4 |
1995:1 - 2004:4 | ||||
Nobs: |
40 |
40 | ||||
R-squared |
0.228 |
0.056 |
0.053 |
0.479 |
0.182 |
0.530 |
Adj. R-squared_________ |
0.134 |
-0.059 |
-0.062 |
0.416 |
0.083 |
0.473 |
Note: Estimates of eq. (5), respectively (6), linking real wages (WR), productivity (PROD), and
unemployment (standardized rate of, UR_STD).
More intriguing information
1. Voting by Committees under Constraints2. The name is absent
3. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
4. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
5. The purpose of this paper is to report on the 2008 inaugural Equal Opportunities Conference held at the University of East Anglia, Norwich
6. Housing Market in Malaga: An Application of the Hedonic Methodology
7. The name is absent
8. Licensing Schemes in Endogenous Entry
9. Unilateral Actions the Case of International Environmental Problems
10. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"