Aggregate Wage Flexibility in Selected New EU Member States 17
Table 5: Cointegration and Error Correction
|
__________________Czech Republic________________ |
Estonia_________________________ | |||||
|
Cointegrating Eq. |
CointEq1 |
CointEq1 | ||||
|
WR(-1) |
1 |
1 | ||||
|
PROD(-1) |
-1.576 *** |
-0.953 *** | ||||
|
-(0.104) |
-(0.024) | |||||
|
UR_STD(-1) |
-0.014 |
0.127 *** | ||||
|
-(0.024) |
-(0.031) | |||||
|
C_________________ |
0.011 |
-0.249 | ||||
|
Error Correction |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
|
CointEql |
-0.061 |
0.063 |
0.733 *** |
-0.347 *** |
0.283 *** |
0.049 |
|
-(0.116) |
-(0.079) |
-(0.240) |
-(0.129) |
-(0.097) |
-(0.338) | |
|
D(WR(-1)) |
0.022 |
-0.002 |
-0.254 |
-0.032 |
-0.167 |
0.043 |
|
-(0.185) |
-(0.126) |
-(0.385) |
-(0.151) |
-(0.114) |
-(0.396) | |
|
D(PROD(-1)) |
0.247 |
0.176 |
-0.508 |
-0.054 |
0.049 |
-0.622 |
|
-(0.290) |
-(0.197) |
-(0.602) |
-(0.181) |
-(0.137) |
-(0.476) | |
|
D(UR(-1)) |
-0.076 |
-0.031 |
0.542 *** |
0.016 |
-0.087 |
0.667 *** |
|
-(0.059) |
-(0.040) |
-(0.122) |
-(0.070) |
-(0.053) |
-(0.184) | |
|
C |
0.010 *** |
0.006 *** |
0.014 *** |
0.015 *** |
0.019 *** |
0.006 |
|
-(0.003) |
-(0.002) |
-(0.006) |
-(0.004) |
-(0.003) |
-(0.011) | |
|
Sample: |
1995:1 - 2004:4 |
1995:1 - 2004:4 | ||||
|
Nobs: |
40 |
40 | ||||
|
R-squared |
0.186 |
0.039 |
0.750 |
0.248 |
0.201 |
0.367 |
|
Adj. R-squared_________ |
0.093 |
-0.070 |
0.721 |
0.162 |
0.110 |
0.294 |
|
Hungary |
Lithuania | |||||
|
Cointegrating Eq. |
CointEq1 |
CointEq1 | ||||
|
WR(-1) |
1 |
1 | ||||
|
PROD(-1) |
-1.967 *** |
-0.618 *** | ||||
|
-(0.347) |
-(0.051) | |||||
|
UR_STD(-1) |
-0.254 |
0.005 | ||||
|
-(0.132) |
-(0.031) | |||||
|
C_________________ |
0.674 |
0.102 | ||||
|
Error Correction |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
|
CointEq1 |
-0.271 *** |
0.057 |
0.122 |
-0.394 *** |
0.092 |
0.405 |
|
-(0.089) |
-(0.049) |
-(0.192) |
-(0.102) |
-(0.107) |
-(0.324) | |
|
D(WR(-1)) |
0.040 |
0.005 |
0.194 |
0.352 *** |
0.221 |
0.223 |
|
-(0.140) |
-(0.077) |
-(0.302) |
-(0.128) |
-(0.135) |
-(0.408) | |
|
D(PROD(-1)) |
-0.407 |
0.220 |
-0.019 |
-0.229 |
-0.301 * |
0.362 |
|
-(0.348) |
-(0.192) |
-(0.751) |
-(0.152) |
-(0.160) |
-(0.484) | |
|
D(UR(-1)) |
0.008 |
0.018 |
0.191 |
0.029 |
-0.009 |
0.583 *** |
|
-(0.083) |
-(0.046) |
-(0.180) |
-(0.047) |
-(0.050) |
-(0.151) | |
|
C |
0.011 *** |
0.006 *** |
-0.010 *** |
0.008 ** |
0.021 *** |
-0.011 |
|
-(0.004) |
-(0.002) |
-(0.009) |
-(0.004) |
-(0.004) |
-(0.013) | |
|
Sample: |
1995:1 - 2004:4 |
1995:1 - 2004:4 | ||||
|
Nobs: |
40 |
40 | ||||
|
R-squared |
0.228 |
0.056 |
0.053 |
0.479 |
0.182 |
0.530 |
|
Adj. R-squared_________ |
0.134 |
-0.059 |
-0.062 |
0.416 |
0.083 |
0.473 |
Note: Estimates of eq. (5), respectively (6), linking real wages (WR), productivity (PROD), and
unemployment (standardized rate of, UR_STD).
More intriguing information
1. Types of Tax Concessions for Promoting Investment in Free Economic and Trade Areas2. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution
3. The name is absent
4. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
5. The name is absent
6. Creating a 2000 IES-LFS Database in Stata
7. The name is absent
8. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Volatility in Precious Metals Markets
9. Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress
10. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics