Aggregate Wage Flexibility in Selected New EU Member States 17
Table 5: Cointegration and Error Correction
__________________Czech Republic________________ |
Estonia_________________________ | |||||
Cointegrating Eq. |
CointEq1 |
CointEq1 | ||||
WR(-1) |
1 |
1 | ||||
PROD(-1) |
-1.576 *** |
-0.953 *** | ||||
-(0.104) |
-(0.024) | |||||
UR_STD(-1) |
-0.014 |
0.127 *** | ||||
-(0.024) |
-(0.031) | |||||
C_________________ |
0.011 |
-0.249 | ||||
Error Correction |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
CointEql |
-0.061 |
0.063 |
0.733 *** |
-0.347 *** |
0.283 *** |
0.049 |
-(0.116) |
-(0.079) |
-(0.240) |
-(0.129) |
-(0.097) |
-(0.338) | |
D(WR(-1)) |
0.022 |
-0.002 |
-0.254 |
-0.032 |
-0.167 |
0.043 |
-(0.185) |
-(0.126) |
-(0.385) |
-(0.151) |
-(0.114) |
-(0.396) | |
D(PROD(-1)) |
0.247 |
0.176 |
-0.508 |
-0.054 |
0.049 |
-0.622 |
-(0.290) |
-(0.197) |
-(0.602) |
-(0.181) |
-(0.137) |
-(0.476) | |
D(UR(-1)) |
-0.076 |
-0.031 |
0.542 *** |
0.016 |
-0.087 |
0.667 *** |
-(0.059) |
-(0.040) |
-(0.122) |
-(0.070) |
-(0.053) |
-(0.184) | |
C |
0.010 *** |
0.006 *** |
0.014 *** |
0.015 *** |
0.019 *** |
0.006 |
-(0.003) |
-(0.002) |
-(0.006) |
-(0.004) |
-(0.003) |
-(0.011) | |
Sample: |
1995:1 - 2004:4 |
1995:1 - 2004:4 | ||||
Nobs: |
40 |
40 | ||||
R-squared |
0.186 |
0.039 |
0.750 |
0.248 |
0.201 |
0.367 |
Adj. R-squared_________ |
0.093 |
-0.070 |
0.721 |
0.162 |
0.110 |
0.294 |
Hungary |
Lithuania | |||||
Cointegrating Eq. |
CointEq1 |
CointEq1 | ||||
WR(-1) |
1 |
1 | ||||
PROD(-1) |
-1.967 *** |
-0.618 *** | ||||
-(0.347) |
-(0.051) | |||||
UR_STD(-1) |
-0.254 |
0.005 | ||||
-(0.132) |
-(0.031) | |||||
C_________________ |
0.674 |
0.102 | ||||
Error Correction |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
D(WR) |
D(PROD) |
D(UR) |
CointEq1 |
-0.271 *** |
0.057 |
0.122 |
-0.394 *** |
0.092 |
0.405 |
-(0.089) |
-(0.049) |
-(0.192) |
-(0.102) |
-(0.107) |
-(0.324) | |
D(WR(-1)) |
0.040 |
0.005 |
0.194 |
0.352 *** |
0.221 |
0.223 |
-(0.140) |
-(0.077) |
-(0.302) |
-(0.128) |
-(0.135) |
-(0.408) | |
D(PROD(-1)) |
-0.407 |
0.220 |
-0.019 |
-0.229 |
-0.301 * |
0.362 |
-(0.348) |
-(0.192) |
-(0.751) |
-(0.152) |
-(0.160) |
-(0.484) | |
D(UR(-1)) |
0.008 |
0.018 |
0.191 |
0.029 |
-0.009 |
0.583 *** |
-(0.083) |
-(0.046) |
-(0.180) |
-(0.047) |
-(0.050) |
-(0.151) | |
C |
0.011 *** |
0.006 *** |
-0.010 *** |
0.008 ** |
0.021 *** |
-0.011 |
-(0.004) |
-(0.002) |
-(0.009) |
-(0.004) |
-(0.004) |
-(0.013) | |
Sample: |
1995:1 - 2004:4 |
1995:1 - 2004:4 | ||||
Nobs: |
40 |
40 | ||||
R-squared |
0.228 |
0.056 |
0.053 |
0.479 |
0.182 |
0.530 |
Adj. R-squared_________ |
0.134 |
-0.059 |
-0.062 |
0.416 |
0.083 |
0.473 |
Note: Estimates of eq. (5), respectively (6), linking real wages (WR), productivity (PROD), and
unemployment (standardized rate of, UR_STD).
More intriguing information
1. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/62. A Theoretical Growth Model for Ireland
3. Reputations, Market Structure, and the Choice of Quality Assurance Systems in the Food Industry
4. The name is absent
5. fMRI Investigation of Cortical and Subcortical Networks in the Learning of Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences
6. The name is absent
7. PER UNIT COSTS TO OWN AND OPERATE FARM MACHINERY
8. The effect of globalisation on industrial districts in Italy: evidence from the footwear sector
9. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
10. The name is absent