Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment



[13] Delfgaauw, J., and R. Dur (2008): “Incentives and Workers’ Motivation in the Public Sector,”
Economic Journal, 118, 171-191.

[14] DellaVigna, S. (2009): “Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field,” Journal of
Economic Literature,
47(2), 315-372.

[15] Dixit, A. (2002): “Incentives and Organizations in the Public Sector: An Interpretative Re-
view,”
Journal of Human Resources, 37(4), 696-727.

[16] Eckel, C. C. and Grossman, P. (1998): “Are Women Less Selfish than Men? Evidence from
Dictator Experiments,”
Economic Journal, 108, 726-35.

[17] Ellingsen, T., and Johannesson, M. (2008): “Pride and Prejudice: The Human Side of Incentive
Theory,”
American Economic Review, 98(3), 990-1008.

[18] Falk, A., and Gaechter, S. (2008): “Experimental Labor Economics,” in Steven Durlauf and
Lawrence E. Blume (eds):
New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan.

[19] Falk, A., and Ichino, A. (2006): “Clean Evidence on Peer Effects,” Journal of Labor Economics,
24, 39-57.

[20] Francois, P. (2000): “‘Public Service Motivation’ as an Argument for Government Provision,”
Journal of Public Economics, 78(3), 275-299.

[21] Francois, P. (2007): “Making a Difference,” RAND Journal of Economics, 38(3), 714-732.

[22] Glazer, A. (2004): “Motivating Devoted Workers,” International Journal of Industrial Orga-
nization,
22(3), 427-440.

[23] Gneezy, U., and J. List (2006): “Putting Behavioral Economics to Work. Testing for Gift
Exchange in Labor Markets Using Field Experiments,”
Econometrica, 74, 1365-1384.

[24] Gregg, P., Grout, P., Smith, S., Ratcliffe, S. and Windmeijer, F. (2009): “How Important is
Pro-Social Behaviour in the Delivery of Public Services?,” CMPO Working Paper No. 08/197.

[25] Gunderson, M. (1989): “Male-Female Wage Differentials and Policy Responses,” Journal of
Economic Literature,
27, 46-72.

[26] Hennig-Schmidt, H., B. Rockenbach, and A. Sadrieh (2008): “In Search of Workers’ Real
Effort Reciprocity - A Field and a Laboratory Experiment,”
Journal of the European Economic
Association, forthcoming.

14



More intriguing information

1. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
2. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
3. Prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and its determinants in first 6 months of life: A prospective study
4. Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation
5. Staying on the Dole
6. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
7. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
8. The name is absent
9. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
10. The name is absent
11. Foreign direct investment in the Indian telecommunications sector
12. The name is absent
13. THE CO-EVOLUTION OF MATTER AND CONSCIOUSNESS1
14. Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index
15. Strategic Policy Options to Improve Irrigation Water Allocation Efficiency: Analysis on Egypt and Morocco
16. Strategic Planning on the Local Level As a Factor of Rural Development in the Republic of Serbia
17. The name is absent
18. AGRICULTURAL TRADE IN THE URUGUAY ROUND: INTO FINAL BATTLE
19. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
20. The name is absent