Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export



Uncertain Productivity Growth

3 THE OPTIMAL MARKET ENTRY MODE


investment rule provides the productivity cut-offs for both market entry modes as

IE δ'c
κ ME


and


κ I βc If δc
V βc - κ Mf


with δc0 = r - α0.


(36)


The difference between the interest rate r and the productivity growth rate α0 represents the real
opportunity cost rate δ
c . For a low productivity growth rate the opportunity costs of delaying
each investment are high, whereas a high growth rate affects δ
c0 negatively.

In the illustrative example in figure 5 exporting is in principle profitable for a current productivity
level between
tf0E and tfE if it is started instantaneously (t=0) but by starting in TE the net present
profits represented by the option value F
E (tf) are higher. Therefore, exporting is postponed until
the current productivity level reaches tf
E at which the investor is indifferent between postponing
and investing into the export platform. Consequently, as long as there is a positive difference
between the option value F
i (tf) and the net present value Vi(tf) -Ii there exists a value of waiting
and the market entry is postponed into T
i*. Due to the same reasoning, for productivity levels
between
tf0F and Γf, the investor postpones his FDI investment decision into TF, although an
immediate market entry would provide profits. Graphically expressed, it is the upper envelope
function in figure 5 which determines the final optimal market entry mode.

Generally, the determination of the optimal market entry mode necessitates the consideration
of two aspects. First, the investor needs again to determine the ordinal rank between the two
productivity cut-offs.

It can be shown that the cut-offs’ rank depends on the different cost structures with

νθ

)1-νθ


¾ Q 1 if Ie Q
11 f             If

(37)


which is the same result as in scenario one.

The conclusion from this equivalent results is that the introduction of growth into the proximity-
concentration trade-off framework does not change the relationship between the productivity
cut-offs compared to the previous scenario. Figure 6 depicts the earlier introduced relative unit
cost box within the proximity-concentration trade-off framework. The rank of the productivity
cut-offs for all possible relative cost constellations is the same as in figure 4.

In order to derive the optimal market entry strategy, it is necessary to determine how the two

19



More intriguing information

1. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
2. Educational Inequalities Among School Leavers in Ireland 1979-1994
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica
6. Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool
7. ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY: THE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY AGENDA
8. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
9. Structural Breakpoints in Volatility in International Markets
10. Modelling Transport in an Interregional General Equilibrium Model with Externalities
11. A Bayesian approach to analyze regional elasticities
12. The name is absent
13. Trade Openness and Volatility
14. The name is absent
15. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform
16. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Qualification-Mismatch and Long-Term Unemployment in a Growth-Matching Model
20. The Mathematical Components of Engineering