An institutional analysis of sasi laut in Maluku, Indonesia



Infrastructure and development

The environment of Haruku is seriously affected by the mining operations executed by Ingold
and Indometal in collaboration with an Indonesian firm Aneka Tambang. Ingold and Indometal
are Canadian companies that are already promoting shares on the international market based
on the results of their explorations on Haruku and further prospecting on Ambon, Saparua
and Nusa Laut. Now that the preliminary drilling has been successful, the mining operations
will be extended with detrimental effects for the environment and the village society. Already,
the intervention has led to political conflicts and soon there will be severe conflicts over land.
There will be infrastructure changes since the government is planning to provide finances for
road construction and public toilets at the end of 1997.

On the other hand, the operations will be beneficial in terms of job opportunities for laborers
and construction companies. The need for increased economic activities has been aggravated
by the current currency crisis in Indonesia.

11.6 Incentives to Cooperate

The keys to resource management are enforcement of, and compliance with, fisheries rules
and regulations. However, various contextual variables affect an individual’s inclination to
participate in, and be governed by,
sasi.

Tradition

Tradition and adat are kept very much alive by the active elders. Sasi is an intrinsic part of the
Haruku culture and automatically, people have great respect for
sasi regulations.

Status

Haruku has a history of resource management. Their sasi system on lompa fish is unique in
the region and widely appreciated. In 1982, Haruku obtained an environmental award from
President Suharto. In 1986, the Minister of Environment, Emil Salim, came to Haruku
personally to open
sasi. These highly appreciated visits have stimulated the people of Haruku
enormously in their willingness to comply to
sasi rules.

Economic benefits

People have direct benefits from marine sasi and sasi lompa. The catches are divided fairly
amongst the villagers and the opening of
sasi is a feast. This is a strong incentive for people to
respect
sasi regulations.

Destructive fishing methods are used by a small part of the population, mainly immigrants,
who have no entitlement to land, and derive little benefit from resource management. This is
their incentive to non-comply. The use of destructive techniques and intensification of the
fishery are, in general, aggravated by the current economic crisis in the country.

Sanctions

The kewang members take a tremendous pride in their position. Their commitment to manage
the resources and enforce the rules is very strong. The vigorous enforcement is a strong

134 An Institutional Analysis of Sasi Laut in Maluku, Indonesia



More intriguing information

1. MULTIMODAL SEMIOTICS OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES: REPRESENTING BELIEFS, METAPHORS, AND ACTIONS
2. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
3. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
4. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
5. GROWTH, UNEMPLOYMENT AND THE WAGE SETTING PROCESS.
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities
9. The constitution and evolution of the stars
10. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
11. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD
12. MATHEMATICS AS AN EXACT AND PRECISE LANGUAGE OF NATURE
13. Motivations, Values and Emotions: Three Sides of the same Coin
14. The name is absent
15. Happiness in Eastern Europe
16. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
17. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany