Table 8.1. Perceptions of fishers (past and current conditions) measured using a self-anchored ladder
scale combined with a structured interview of 15 questions. n=508 heads of fishing households, either
from a marine sasi village (n=211) or non-sasi village (n=297). Significance of differences tested as per
section 2.3.3. Probabilities as follows: ns=not significant, *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001.
|
Indicator |
Average |
Prob. |
Average |
Prob. |
Average change |
Prob. | |||
|
Sasi |
No |
Sasi |
No |
Sasi |
No | ||||
|
Equity | |||||||||
|
Role of fishers in management |
6.56 |
6.48 |
ns |
6.70 |
6.57 |
ns |
+ 0.1 ns |
+ 0.1 ns |
ns |
|
Degree of access to marine resources |
8.33 |
8.60 |
ns |
7.56 |
7.78 |
ns |
- 0.8*** |
- 0.8*** |
ns |
|
Fair distribution of fishing gears |
6.09 |
5.85 |
ns |
7.23 |
7.32 |
ns |
+ 1.1*** |
+ 1.5*** |
ns |
|
Economic equality among villagers |
6.79 |
6.30 |
** |
6.57 |
6.59 |
ns |
- 0.2 ns |
+ 0.3* |
* |
|
Efficiency | |||||||||
|
Communal decision-making |
6.92 |
6.44 |
* |
6.85 |
6.71 |
ns |
+ 0.1 ns |
+ 0.3 ns |
ns |
|
Ease of entry into the fishery |
8.34 |
8.44 |
ns |
7.50 |
7.45 |
ns |
- 0.8*** |
- 1.0*** |
ns |
|
Control over access to fishery |
6.76 |
6.35 |
ns |
7.20 |
6.41 |
*** |
+ 0.4** |
-0.06 ns |
ns |
|
Compliance with fishery rules |
7.63 |
7.68 |
ns |
7.45 |
7.09 |
* |
- 0.2* |
- 0.6* |
* |
|
Social Sustainability | |||||||||
|
Tradition of collective action |
8.69 |
8.39 |
* |
7.67 |
7.15 |
** |
- 1.0*** |
- 1.2*** |
** |
|
Family well-being |
6.24 |
6.34 |
ns |
7.10 |
7.10 |
ns |
+ 0.9*** |
+ 0.8** |
ns |
|
Income |
6.71 |
6.19 |
** |
6.42 |
6.82 |
** |
- 0.3 ns |
+ 0.6*** |
*** |
|
Community harmony |
8.03 |
7.96 |
ns |
6.90 |
6.21 |
*** |
- 1.1*** |
- 1.8*** |
** |
|
Discussion of village issues |
8.34 |
8.01 |
* |
7.50 |
7.11 |
* |
- 0.8*** |
- 0.9*** |
ns |
|
Biological sustainability | |||||||||
|
Marine resource health |
8.77 |
8.45 |
*** |
5.92 |
5.81 |
ns |
- 2.9*** |
- 2.6*** |
ns |
|
Fish catch |
8.93 |
8.70 |
ns |
5.50 |
5.73 |
ns |
- 3.4*** |
- 3.0*** |
* |
Table 8.2. Perceptions of fishers (current conditions and future expectations) measured using a self-
anchored ladder scale combined with a structured interview of 15 questions. n=508 heads of fishing
households, either from a marine sasi village (n=211) or non-sasi village (n=297). Significance of
differences tested as per section 2.3.3. Probabilities as follows: ns=difference not statistically significant;
*=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001.
|
Indicator |
Average |
Prob. |
Average |
Prob. |
Average change |
Prob. | |||
|
Sasi |
No |
Sasi |
No |
Sasi |
No | ||||
|
Equity | |||||||||
|
Role of fishers in management |
6.70 |
6.57 |
ns |
6.81 |
6.58 |
* |
+ 0.11ns |
+ 0.01ns |
ns |
|
Degree of access to marine resources |
7.56 |
7.78 |
ns |
7.03 |
6.89 |
ns |
- 0.53*** |
- 0.89*** |
** |
|
Fair distribution of fishing gears |
7.23 |
7.32 |
ns |
7.65 |
8.00 |
ns |
+ 0.42*** |
- 0.68*** |
ns |
|
Economic equality among villagers |
6.57 |
6.59 |
ns |
6.45 |
6.69 |
ns |
- 0.12 ns |
+ 0.10ns |
ns |
|
Efficiency | |||||||||
|
Communal decision-making |
6.85 |
6.71 |
ns |
6.83 |
6.76 |
* |
- 0.02 ns |
- 0.74 *** |
ns |
|
Ease of entry into the fishery |
7.50 |
7.45 |
ns |
6.79 |
6.49 |
ns |
- 0.72*** |
- 0.96*** |
ns |
|
Control over access to fishery |
7.20 |
6.41 |
*** |
7.54 |
6.59 |
*** |
+ 0.33* |
+0.17 ns |
ns |
|
Compliance with fishery rules |
7.45 |
7.09 |
* |
7.06 |
6.59 |
ns |
- 0.39*** |
- 0.50*** |
ns |
|
Social Sustainability | |||||||||
|
Tradition of collective action |
7.67 |
7.15 |
** |
6.91 |
6.41 |
** |
- 0.76*** |
- 0.74*** |
ns |
|
Family well-being |
7.10 |
7.10 |
ns |
7.47 |
7.48 |
ns |
+ 0.37** |
+ 0.39*** |
ns |
|
Income |
6.42 |
6.82 |
** |
6.47 |
7.23 |
** |
+0.05 ns |
+ 0.41*** |
* |
|
Community harmony |
6.90 |
6.21 |
*** |
6.35 |
5.55 |
*** |
- 0.55*** |
-0.66*** |
ns |
|
Discussion of village issues |
7.50 |
7.11 |
* |
7.36 |
6.72 |
** |
- 0.12ns |
- 0.40*** |
ns |
|
Biological sustainability | |||||||||
|
Marine resource health |
5.92 |
5.81 |
ns |
5.92 |
4.56 |
ns |
- 1.18*** |
- 1.25*** |
ns |
|
Fish catch |
5.50 |
5.73 |
ns |
5.50 |
4.49 |
ns |
- 1.11*** |
-1.24*** |
ns |
Comparison of Equity, Efficiency and Sustainability in Sasi and Non-Sasi Villages of Central Maluku 83
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Healthy state, worried workers: North Carolina in the world economy
3. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
4. Draft of paper published in:
5. The Folklore of Sorting Algorithms
6. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?
7. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
8. Structural Breakpoints in Volatility in International Markets
9. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
10. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case