Table 8.1. Perceptions of fishers (past and current conditions) measured using a self-anchored ladder
scale combined with a structured interview of 15 questions. n=508 heads of fishing households, either
from a marine sasi village (n=211) or non-sasi village (n=297). Significance of differences tested as per
section 2.3.3. Probabilities as follows: ns=not significant, *=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001.
Indicator |
Average |
Prob. |
Average |
Prob. |
Average change |
Prob. | |||
Sasi |
No |
Sasi |
No |
Sasi |
No | ||||
Equity | |||||||||
Role of fishers in management |
6.56 |
6.48 |
ns |
6.70 |
6.57 |
ns |
+ 0.1 ns |
+ 0.1 ns |
ns |
Degree of access to marine resources |
8.33 |
8.60 |
ns |
7.56 |
7.78 |
ns |
- 0.8*** |
- 0.8*** |
ns |
Fair distribution of fishing gears |
6.09 |
5.85 |
ns |
7.23 |
7.32 |
ns |
+ 1.1*** |
+ 1.5*** |
ns |
Economic equality among villagers |
6.79 |
6.30 |
** |
6.57 |
6.59 |
ns |
- 0.2 ns |
+ 0.3* |
* |
Efficiency | |||||||||
Communal decision-making |
6.92 |
6.44 |
* |
6.85 |
6.71 |
ns |
+ 0.1 ns |
+ 0.3 ns |
ns |
Ease of entry into the fishery |
8.34 |
8.44 |
ns |
7.50 |
7.45 |
ns |
- 0.8*** |
- 1.0*** |
ns |
Control over access to fishery |
6.76 |
6.35 |
ns |
7.20 |
6.41 |
*** |
+ 0.4** |
-0.06 ns |
ns |
Compliance with fishery rules |
7.63 |
7.68 |
ns |
7.45 |
7.09 |
* |
- 0.2* |
- 0.6* |
* |
Social Sustainability | |||||||||
Tradition of collective action |
8.69 |
8.39 |
* |
7.67 |
7.15 |
** |
- 1.0*** |
- 1.2*** |
** |
Family well-being |
6.24 |
6.34 |
ns |
7.10 |
7.10 |
ns |
+ 0.9*** |
+ 0.8** |
ns |
Income |
6.71 |
6.19 |
** |
6.42 |
6.82 |
** |
- 0.3 ns |
+ 0.6*** |
*** |
Community harmony |
8.03 |
7.96 |
ns |
6.90 |
6.21 |
*** |
- 1.1*** |
- 1.8*** |
** |
Discussion of village issues |
8.34 |
8.01 |
* |
7.50 |
7.11 |
* |
- 0.8*** |
- 0.9*** |
ns |
Biological sustainability | |||||||||
Marine resource health |
8.77 |
8.45 |
*** |
5.92 |
5.81 |
ns |
- 2.9*** |
- 2.6*** |
ns |
Fish catch |
8.93 |
8.70 |
ns |
5.50 |
5.73 |
ns |
- 3.4*** |
- 3.0*** |
* |
Table 8.2. Perceptions of fishers (current conditions and future expectations) measured using a self-
anchored ladder scale combined with a structured interview of 15 questions. n=508 heads of fishing
households, either from a marine sasi village (n=211) or non-sasi village (n=297). Significance of
differences tested as per section 2.3.3. Probabilities as follows: ns=difference not statistically significant;
*=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001.
Indicator |
Average |
Prob. |
Average |
Prob. |
Average change |
Prob. | |||
Sasi |
No |
Sasi |
No |
Sasi |
No | ||||
Equity | |||||||||
Role of fishers in management |
6.70 |
6.57 |
ns |
6.81 |
6.58 |
* |
+ 0.11ns |
+ 0.01ns |
ns |
Degree of access to marine resources |
7.56 |
7.78 |
ns |
7.03 |
6.89 |
ns |
- 0.53*** |
- 0.89*** |
** |
Fair distribution of fishing gears |
7.23 |
7.32 |
ns |
7.65 |
8.00 |
ns |
+ 0.42*** |
- 0.68*** |
ns |
Economic equality among villagers |
6.57 |
6.59 |
ns |
6.45 |
6.69 |
ns |
- 0.12 ns |
+ 0.10ns |
ns |
Efficiency | |||||||||
Communal decision-making |
6.85 |
6.71 |
ns |
6.83 |
6.76 |
* |
- 0.02 ns |
- 0.74 *** |
ns |
Ease of entry into the fishery |
7.50 |
7.45 |
ns |
6.79 |
6.49 |
ns |
- 0.72*** |
- 0.96*** |
ns |
Control over access to fishery |
7.20 |
6.41 |
*** |
7.54 |
6.59 |
*** |
+ 0.33* |
+0.17 ns |
ns |
Compliance with fishery rules |
7.45 |
7.09 |
* |
7.06 |
6.59 |
ns |
- 0.39*** |
- 0.50*** |
ns |
Social Sustainability | |||||||||
Tradition of collective action |
7.67 |
7.15 |
** |
6.91 |
6.41 |
** |
- 0.76*** |
- 0.74*** |
ns |
Family well-being |
7.10 |
7.10 |
ns |
7.47 |
7.48 |
ns |
+ 0.37** |
+ 0.39*** |
ns |
Income |
6.42 |
6.82 |
** |
6.47 |
7.23 |
** |
+0.05 ns |
+ 0.41*** |
* |
Community harmony |
6.90 |
6.21 |
*** |
6.35 |
5.55 |
*** |
- 0.55*** |
-0.66*** |
ns |
Discussion of village issues |
7.50 |
7.11 |
* |
7.36 |
6.72 |
** |
- 0.12ns |
- 0.40*** |
ns |
Biological sustainability | |||||||||
Marine resource health |
5.92 |
5.81 |
ns |
5.92 |
4.56 |
ns |
- 1.18*** |
- 1.25*** |
ns |
Fish catch |
5.50 |
5.73 |
ns |
5.50 |
4.49 |
ns |
- 1.11*** |
-1.24*** |
ns |
Comparison of Equity, Efficiency and Sustainability in Sasi and Non-Sasi Villages of Central Maluku 83
More intriguing information
1. Constructing the Phylomemetic Tree Case of Study: Indonesian Tradition-Inspired Buildings2. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
3. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
4. Assessing Economic Complexity with Input-Output Based Measures
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent