Strategic Investment and Market Integration



assumed that x is above the output level of a natural monopoly. In other words, the entry-
deterring incumbent in our model is operating beyond the scale of operation it would choose, if it
did not face potential entry.

Next, three results from the Hrst version of the multi-market game, Γ^, can be shown. First, D
is a su
fficient condition on entry deterrence in the multi-market game. Second, if Hrms compete in
strategic substitutes, then D is not only a su
fficient, but a necessary, condition for entry deterrence.
Third, if both conditions S and D are satis
Hed, the incumbent installs strictly more than n ■ x to
deter entry in Γ
^.

If D is satisHed the local entrant does not earn a positive proHt in {x"t∙ xf}, and would thus stay
out of the local market. To see that D is a su
fficient condition for entry deterrence, assume that
the incumbent has installed more capacity in period 0 than he will ever use. Thus, every market
can be treated independently and the unique Nash equilibrium in every market
t is {x'"λ∙X∕''}, and
entry deterrence is thus possible.

Proposition 1 If D is satisfied, then entry deterrence is possible in Γ^.

Proof. (D entry deterrence is possible). Let the pre-commitment capacity be very large. The
capacity constraint is not binding in any subgame. The objective of the incumbent is to maximize
its pro
Ht with respect to x, for all t,

V (x, xf)

0     t.


(5)


xfl

This problem is additively independent and each market can be considered as a separate one-
market game Γ
1. If the capacity constraint is not binding, the unique Nash equilibrium with entry
is
xrn.xl}, where x= β0 (xt), xt = βt (xlfif. Since v (xt,x7fi) cxt A0, player t will choose
to stay out and monopoly prevails. ■

Next, we will show that, the deterrence condition (D) is not only a sufficient, but also a necessary
condition on entry deterrence, if
Hrms compete in strategic substitutes. Strategic substitutes (S)
imply that the pro
Ht of a potential entrant is monotonically decreasing in the incumbent output.
If
к does not restrict output, then {x^rXt} is the unique Nash equilibrium with entry in market
t. Furthermore,
x is the highest output the incumbent will select with any capacity к. Hence,



More intriguing information

1. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Spectral calibration of exponential Lévy Models [1]
5. Artificial neural networks as models of stimulus control*
6. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
7. The Shepherd Sinfonia
8. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
9. The name is absent
10. Staying on the Dole
11. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
12. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent
13. The name is absent
14. The demand for urban transport: An application of discrete choice model for Cadiz
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers
18. The Values and Character Dispositions of 14-16 Year Olds in the Hodge Hill Constituency
19. Motivations, Values and Emotions: Three Sides of the same Coin
20. The name is absent