Strategic Investment and Market Integration



Proof. Appendix B ■

The first and the second version of the multi-market game differ in one important respect. If
the incumbent installed enough capacity to deter simultaneous entry by all potential competitors
but not enough to deter unilateral entry by one potential competitor, then the potential entrants
would face a coordination problem in the second version of the game. This coordination problem
does not occur in the
first version where player 1 enters and player 2 stays out. In the second
version, both potential competitors wish to enter if they are the only entrant, but not otherwise. 9

The coordination problem in the second version of the game remains unsolved, since both Nash
equilibria are strict. This problem will not be further dealt with, since we are mainly interested in
the conditions on entry deterrence. In a real market situation, however, the coordination problem
may a
ffect the entrants’ decisions and, possibly, facilitate entry-deterrence.

5 Competition from a Multi-Market Entrant

Once more, a multi-market firm has advertised and meets demand for its product in n markets. In
the third version of the multi-market game, a single potential competitor, another multi-market
company, considers entry in all markets selling the same product as the established
firm. The
incumbent’s global patent expires at the same time in all markets and the potential competitor
may enter all local markets simultaneously. Entry in each market is associated with a
fixed sunk
cost, which can be considered an advertising cost. The multi-market entrant remains unknown in
all markets where it does not advertise. If the second multi-market
firm enters the local market,
the incumbent and the entrant choose their output simultaneously and the market will clear as a
duopoly.

The rules of the third version of the game are defined as follows. The game, rɜ, has two
players, called player
m and player e. The game is played over a sequence of two periods. In the
first period, the established firm must choose a pre-entry capacity, k. At the beginning of the
second period, the potential competitor must decide to enter or stay out in
n separate markets
called
t = 1, ...,n. Player e’s decision is immediately announced to player m. If player e decides
9This is a version of the "chicken” game.

12



More intriguing information

1. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
2. A Review of Kuhnian and Lakatosian “Explanations” in Economics
3. On the origin of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect
4. Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis
5. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities
6. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
7. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA
8. The name is absent
9. Strategic Policy Options to Improve Irrigation Water Allocation Efficiency: Analysis on Egypt and Morocco
10. An Intertemporal Benchmark Model for Turkey’s Current Account
11. Word searches: on the use of verbal and non-verbal resources during classroom talk
12. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren
13. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
14. How Offshoring Can Affect the Industries’ Skill Composition
15. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach
16. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
17. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement
18. A Rational Analysis of Alternating Search and Reflection Strategies in Problem Solving
19. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
20. Moi individuel et moi cosmique Dans la pensee de Romain Rolland