Appendix A. Sequential Entry
Proof. Step 1. Start in period n. Let the remaining capacity be kn = kn-1 — x^-↑ ■ There are
two subgames; either player n enters or stays out of market n. In the subgame with entry, the
unique Nash equilibrium is {xt^ (kn), -r^}, where xt^ (kn) = min {kn,x™} and "xrn = βe (xtβ (kn)).
If player n decides to stay out of market n, we have the following limit Nash equilibrium [x™', θ},
where ^ym (x™, θ) = 0. The unique Nash equilibrium in the subgame with no entry is {x)(λ (k), 0},
where x™ (kn) = min {kn,x™}. From S, it follows that x™ > x™.
Step 2. Player n would enter if kn < x and stay out as long as kn ≥ x. To deter entry, player m
would need kn ≥ x. Now, assume that enough unused capacity remains to deter entry. Rewrite the
equilibrium output of player m in period n as a function of kn-ι and x%-ι, i.e. x™ (kn-ι, x%-ι ) =
min {kn-i — xrβ-1,χm}.
Step 3. Working backwards to period n — 1, we have two subgames; either player n — 1 enters or
stays out of market n — 1. First, capacity kn-ι would ensure a successful commitment by player
m in market n — 1 to an output x™—i, if and only if:
°v °x™ °V
-----(T™ 1,β1 (T™ 1)) + —ɪ ∙ -— (x™ (k,T™ 1), 0) ≥ 0 (13)
я„,™ ∖ n-1, ∖ n- 1)) а^т Ягг-т ∖ n V , n-1 ) , ) — V >
°xn-1 °xn-1 °xn
Now, ∂χm = —1 if k ≤ x™ + τm and g∂⅛ (k, 2:^-1 ) = 0 if k > x™ + xrβ^. To deter entry, player
m has to commit to T in the subgame with entry. The following inequality must be satished:
°V °V
-°^(x, в™(T)) = ° °c, 0) (14)
If xn-1 > 0, it follows from (S) that xrβ > x ⇒ kn-1 > 2T. If (D) holds with equality, i.e.
T = x™, then the LHS of equality [14] is equal to zero and the equality is satished if and only if
, ~ =rn , , ~ , =rn
kn-1 — x = x ⇒ kn-1 = x + x .
Step ^. Working backwards to period n — 2, we have two subgames; either player n — 2 enters or
stays out of market n — 2. First, capacity kn-2 would deter entry if:
°v ° V
∂x^- (t, в™ (T)) = ∂x^
°xn-2 °xn-1
° ° °V
(x™.,, 0 = (x™, 0)
∖ n- 1 ’ / rnrm × n ’ '
^x >x ^n
(15)
26
More intriguing information
1. Studying How E-Markets Evaluation Can Enhance Trust in Virtual Business Communities2. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement
3. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
4. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
5. Family, social security and social insurance: General remarks and the present discussion in Germany as a case study
6. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
10. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren