Appendix B. Simultaneous Entry
This proof is valid for the main result in the second and third versions of the multi-market game.
Proof. Step 1. Begin in stage two. The objective of player m in the second stage is to solve the
following program:
max υ (x™, xf ) + V (x™, xf) + ∙∙ + v (ʃ^, x”)
o f ™n ™7l I I ™n < ‰
s.t. X1 + Xf + ∙∙ + X^ ≤ rv
If x™ + x™ + ∙∙ + xr^ < k, then ∂v (x^,ln, xf^) ∕∂x™ = 0 for t = 1, ..., n. If x™ + x™ = k, then
∂v (x™, x↑) ∕∂x™ = ∂v (x™, xf) ∕dx™ = ∙∙ = ∂V (x™, x”) ∕∂x™.
Step 2. In the last stage there are 2” subgames. First, if entry does not occur in any market and
k > nx™, then ∂v (x^,∣n, 0) ∕∂x^ra = 0 for all t = 1, ..., n ⇒ x™ = x™ for all t. If k ≤ nx™, then
∂v (x™, x1) ∕∂x™ = ∂v (x™1,x2) ∕∂xιy = ∙∙ = ∂V (x™, xS) ∕∂x^ ⇒ x2l = - for all t.
∖l^l∕/ I ∖ c_ 1 C_ / I ” \”^”// ” l ”
Step 3. Second, if one player enters (w.l.o.g. player 1) and k > x™+(n — 1) x™, then ∂v (x™, xf) ∕∂x1y =
0 and ∂V (x™, 0) ∕∂x^ = 0 ⇒ x™ = x™ and x™ = x™ for t = 2, ∙∙, n. If k ≤ x™ + (n — 1) x™,
then from (S) ∂v (x™, xf) ∕∂xl-∖ = ∂v (x™, 0) ∕∂x^ for t = 2, ∙∙∙,n ⇒ x™ < k∕n and x™ > k∕n. To
deter the entry of a single entrant while n — 1 players stays out, the incumbent must install
∂V (x™,xe) = dv (⅛≡d, 0)
dx™ dx™ l )
and from (S) k > nx.
Step X Next, if capacity k deters the entry of a single entrant, k deters the entry of more than
one player, which is shown with induction. Assume k deters the entry of t players. Then
where entry occurs in i and no entry occurs in market j. If t +1 players enter, deterrence is credible
if
∂v (x™, xe) /dx™ — ∂v
/(k — tx™)
∖ (n — t)
0) ∕∂x™
(19)
∂v (X™, xe) /dx™ — ∂v ((k(~ (t +^1ζap, 0) ∕∂x™ > 0 (20)
where entry occurs in i and no entry occurs in market j. The last inequality holds as long as
k > nx. Hence, we have shown that if capacity k deters the entry of a single entrant, then k deters
the entry of more than one entrant.
28
More intriguing information
1. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA2. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria
3. Draft of paper published in:
4. The name is absent
5. What should educational research do, and how should it do it? A response to “Will a clinical approach make educational research more relevant to practice” by Jacquelien Bulterman-Bos
6. Nurses' retention and hospital characteristics in New South Wales, CHERE Discussion Paper No 52
7. EMU's Decentralized System of Fiscal Policy
8. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
9. Locke's theory of perception
10. Structural Breakpoints in Volatility in International Markets