An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.



2.5.1 Bayesian Methods

Bayesian estimation entails obtaining the posterior distribution of the model’s parameters,

say θ, conditional on the data. Using the Bayes’ theorem, the posterior distribution is

obtained as:


p ( θY T ) =


L ( Y T θ ) p ( θ )
R L ( Y T θ ) p ( θ )


(35)


where p(θ) denotes the prior density of the parameter vector θ, L(YTθ/) is the likelihood of
the sample
YT with T observations (evaluated with the Kalman filter) and L(YT θ)p(θ) is
the marginal likelihood. Since there is no closed form analytical expression for the posterior,
this must be simulated.

One of the main advantages of adopting a Bayesian approach is that it facilitates a formal
comparison of different models through their posterior marginal likelihoods, computed using
the Geweke (1999) modified harmonic-mean estimator. For a given model
mi M and
common data set, the marginal likelihood is obtained by integrating out vector
θ,

(YTmi} = L L (YTθ,mi} p (θmi)
Θ

(36)


where pi (θmi) is the prior density for model mi, and L YTmi is the data density for
model
mi given parameter vector θ. To compare models (say, mi and mj ) we calculate
the posterior odds ratio which is the ratio of their posterior model probabilities (or Bayes
Factor when the prior odds ratio,
p(mi), is set to unity):
in terms of the log-likelihoods. Components (37) and (38) provide a framework for com-
paring alternative and potentially misspecified models based on their marginal likelihood.
Such comparisons are important in the assessment of rival models, as the model which
attains the highest odds outperforms its rivals and is therefore favoured.

POi,j

BFi,j


p(miYT) _ L(YTmi)p(mi)
p ( mj Y T )   L ( Y T mj ) p ( mj )

L ( Y T mi )   exp( LL ( Y T mi ))

L ( Y T mj )   exp( LL ( Y T mj ))


(37)

(38)


Given Bayes factors, we can easily compute the model probabilities p 1 ,p2, ∙ ∙ ∙,pn for n
models. Since ɪɪ ∣ pi = 1 we have that pl = ∑n=2 BFi, 1, from which p 1 is obtained. Then
pi = p1B F(i, 1) gives the remaining model probabilities.

2.5.2 Data, Priors and Calibration

To estimate the system for each economy, we use four macroeconomic observables at quar-
terly frequency. For the US, we use real GDP, real investment, the GDP deflator and
the nominal interest rate. All data are taken from the FRED Database available through
the Federal Reserve Bank of St.Louis and the sample period is 1980:1-2006:4. We use the

10



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
3. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
4. Initial Public Offerings and Venture Capital in Germany
5. The name is absent
6. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
7. Human Development and Regional Disparities in Iran:A Policy Model
8. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
9. Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade Growth - A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear (Forecasting) Models
10. FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS