Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations



Sex differences in social networks

20


time with friends outside of the group. The large social networks of boys consisting of friends and
non-friends are not contexts which will encourage self disclosure of thoughts and feelings, though
these may be evident in interactions outside school; however the small networks of boys observed in
this study may be more likely to experience close social relations.

Findings also have implications for interactions and behaviour when social networks
fragment and when individual children become ostracised from their group and thus implications
for day to day interactions aimed at avoiding these states. The presence of friends outside of the
social network provides girls with alternative relationships that can be called upon in times of
conflict or further developed to facilitate entry to a new group when required. However, this safety
net may also function to undermine the stability of networks and make conflict more likely. By
contrast, for boys, ostracism from the group may have a much larger impact. With few friends
outside of the group that they can link up with, boys are less likely to want to fall out with other
members of their social network. This threat may ensure the stability of boys’ social networks and
will also ensure less conflict but more compliance within the network.

Results also indicated that the cores of both male and female networks consisted of children
who were best friends or friends. This suggests that social networks are often centred on friendships
and it may be the case that the stability of these networks is dependent on the stability of these
friendships, particularly among girls. However it is unclear how important these core relationships
are, since other children that were more weakly associated with the network also had best friends
and friends in the group.

It was also notable that some cores did not consist of friends. The most obvious explanation
for this might be that a friendship nomination was simply not reciprocated. Another explanation
might be that some children use friends as a secure base from which to explore the rest of the social
world and thus spend little time with their friends. It is also possible that there is a dynamic between
social networks and friendships in school such that those children a child enjoys spending time with
on a day-to-day basis may not be friends at that immediate point in time but may become friends at



More intriguing information

1. Imputing Dairy Producers' Quota Discount Rate Using the Individual Export Milk Program in Quebec
2. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
3. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
4. The name is absent
5. Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Institutions, and Fiscal Performance
6. The name is absent
7. Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas
8. Housing Market in Malaga: An Application of the Hedonic Methodology
9. Unilateral Actions the Case of International Environmental Problems
10. Regulation of the Electricity Industry in Bolivia: Its Impact on Access to the Poor, Prices and Quality
11. European Integration: Some stylised facts
12. The name is absent
13. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
14. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
15. LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
16. The name is absent
17. Gerontocracy in Motion? – European Cross-Country Evidence on the Labor Market Consequences of Population Ageing
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. Education Research Gender, Education and Development - A Partially Annotated and Selective Bibliography