Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations



Sex differences in social networks

33


Figure 1

Examples of the emergent internal structure of four whole social networks showing connections between individuals and an illustration of the numbers
of members cohering together at each threshold level.


Notes: Encircled numbers indicate the number in the network at that level. Girls are marked with a ‘G’, boys with a ‘B’. A solid line between members
indicates 50%+ co-occurrence, a dashed line indicates 37.5%+ co-ocurrence and a dotted line 25%+ co-ocurrence. Network 1 consists of members
connected only at the core level. Network 2 consists of members connected only at the group level. Network 3 consists of members connected only at
core and group levels. Network 4 consists of two cores that come together at the cluster level with 3 additional members and a final member at the
group level.



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
4. PROJECTED COSTS FOR SELECTED LOUISIANA VEGETABLE CROPS - 1997 SEASON
5. The name is absent
6. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
7. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
8. The name is absent
9. National urban policy responses in the European Union: Towards a European urban policy?
10. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.