Sex differences in social networks
33
Figure 1
Examples of the emergent internal structure of four whole social networks showing connections between individuals and an illustration of the numbers
of members cohering together at each threshold level.

Notes: Encircled numbers indicate the number in the network at that level. Girls are marked with a ‘G’, boys with a ‘B’. A solid line between members
indicates 50%+ co-occurrence, a dashed line indicates 37.5%+ co-ocurrence and a dotted line 25%+ co-ocurrence. Network 1 consists of members
connected only at the core level. Network 2 consists of members connected only at the group level. Network 3 consists of members connected only at
core and group levels. Network 4 consists of two cores that come together at the cluster level with 3 additional members and a final member at the
group level.
More intriguing information
1. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters2. The name is absent
3. Centre for Longitudinal Studies
4. An Intertemporal Benchmark Model for Turkey’s Current Account
5. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
6. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
7. The name is absent
8. Unemployment in an Interdependent World
9. Financial Market Volatility and Primary Placements
10. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region