Sex differences in social networks
30
Table 2
Descriptive Statistics for the Number of Best Friends and Friends, the Overlap Between Friendship
and Social Networks by Sex at Time 2.
Male |
Female |
Total | |||||
Mean |
S.D. |
Mean |
S.D. |
Mean |
S.D. |
N | |
Friendship relations | |||||||
Number of reciprocal best friends |
4.94 |
5.50 |
4.47 |
3.87 |
4.68 |
4.65 |
121 |
Number of reciprocal friends |
13.57 |
8.55 |
13.93 |
8.59 |
13.77 |
8.54 |
121 |
Social network - |
friendship overlap | ||||||
% core that are best friends |
46.98 |
40.44 |
53.08 |
41.10 |
49.87 |
40.50 |
57 |
% core that are friends |
72.70 |
34.61 |
97.53 |
8.89 |
84.46 |
28.52 |
57 |
% of group that are best friends |
19.91 |
27.10 |
41.88 |
38.17 |
31.09 |
34.84 |
112 |
% of group that are friends |
44.24 |
33.20 |
65.80 |
33.37 |
55.21 |
34.86 |
112 |
% best friends that are in core |
48.45 |
47.77 |
31.17 |
43.68 |
38.53 |
46.03 |
94 |
% friends that are in core |
33.10 |
37.90 |
21.44 |
29.97 |
26.63 |
34.08 |
119 |
% of best friends in group |
90.15 |
26.65 |
71.67 |
40.95 |
79.53 |
36.58 |
94 |
% of friends in group |
77.05 |
28.21 |
47.02 |
35.95 |
60.40 |
35.88 |
119 |
Note. Analyses are presented for Time 2 data only but replicate findings at Time 1.
More intriguing information
1. Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California2. Cultural Diversity and Human Rights: a propos of a minority educational reform
3. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
4. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
5. The changing face of Chicago: demographic trends in the 1990s
6. Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!? On the Role of Entrepreneurial Experience for Firm Survival
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Weak and strong sustainability indicators, and regional environmental resources
10. The name is absent