Centre for Longitudinal Studies



Appendix 7

NCDS cases where two birth outcomes are separated by more than
three days, but less than 9 months.

010168Y

041001K

044001A

046040X

048074B

050068V

055086Z

083034N

083055W

084004J

092098S

092144W

093021K

094029H

095006Z

095023Z

100020Q

100023W

110304M

120128Z

120132Q

181038T

184008Z

186055V

186152T

187001A

188030P

215003F

223020B

230016B

233005N

233008U

235018J

280041J

280053R

285020B

286019Y

288016C

288027J

310017Y

310069U

310107Z

330044Q

350146M

382004V

385025V

385085Q

400004Q

400024W

410007C

421009U

421017T

424031C

431017Z

465003D

500053M

500353Z

500375L

503020M

509206K

509228V

510127W

510161W

513053K

513136P

514030B

515008Q

515085K

517006W

517033Z

524002C

528006J

529009V

550118W

550227B

565034Y

581068J

583074P

591050U

620037K

630002V

630027N

650034X

650136F

681009Y

684001X

730049F

730084J

730130N

730135Y

780019D

823509H

825073F

850027R

855004E

880048U

880088H

937058L

950123U

950154F

950172J

950288D

950290Q

960029K

960072L

980004E

985067J

986039J

986140W

986192S

986205Y

986310V

986313B

987040X

987100P

989011A

X25089V

X25101F

X32084Z

X38006L

X67014Y

X78037Y

X82164E

X82287X

X82344H

Y00070R

Y00174D

Y00247E

Y00293N

Y20154L

Y20159W

Y21019K

Y31043N

133 cases in total.

On manual scrutiny, 62 of these were plausible, e.g. two miscarriages seven months
apart, listed in separate pregnancies.

However, the following 71 cases were problematic in some way or other. The middle
column contains a ‘C’ if the case record was changed by this cleaning exercise.

nserial Ch?Comments

041001K

044001A

055086Z

083034N

084004J

094029H

095006Z

095023Z


Miscarriage 1992 (no month), abortion July 92, in same pregnancy. Assume OK.

C Double miscarriage, with single miscarriage & three other livebirths in wrong order

C Live birth with miscarriage 6 months later (i.e. OK), also still pregnant, but order wrong

C Two live births 2 weeks apart, different pregnancies, & order wrong. Move to same pregnancy

C Chronological order completely confused

C Two live births a month apart, and wrong order, but both pre-1991 anyway, so delete.

C Two live births a fortnight apart, placed in separate pregnancies. Move to same preg.

C Stillbirth eight days after live birth. OK, but order wrong

100023W

110304M C

120132Q C


Miscarriage, then live birth 6 months later, same pregnancy. Assume OK.

Two miscarriages 4 months apart, sep.pregnancies. Assume OK, but order is wrong
Order wrong, involving stillbirth and live birth and one separate pregnancy.



More intriguing information

1. Public-private sector pay differentials in a devolved Scotland
2. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3
3. The Functions of Postpartum Depression
4. Globalization, Redistribution, and the Composition of Public Education Expenditures
5. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
6. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
7. An Attempt to 2
8. The effect of globalisation on industrial districts in Italy: evidence from the footwear sector
9. Skills, Partnerships and Tenancy in Sri Lankan Rice Farms
10. Philosophical Perspectives on Trustworthiness and Open-mindedness as Professional Virtues for the Practice of Nursing: Implications for he Moral Education of Nurses
11. THE EFFECT OF MARKETING COOPERATIVES ON COST-REDUCING PROCESS INNOVATION ACTIVITY
12. Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade Growth - A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear (Forecasting) Models
13. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF COTTON AND PEANUT RESEARCH IN SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
14. The name is absent
15. Gerontocracy in Motion? – European Cross-Country Evidence on the Labor Market Consequences of Population Ageing
16. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
17. The name is absent
18. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties
19. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
20. Wirtschaftslage und Reformprozesse in Estland, Lettland, und Litauen: Bericht 2001