Centre for Longitudinal Studies



X25101F

C

Miscarriage, then live birth 8 months later. Pregf=3 (‘on time’): assume same preg, re-order.

X32084Z

C

Chronological order confused

X82287X

C

Live birth, then miscarriage 2 months later, different preg. OK, but order needs reversing.

X82344H

C

Two live births 3.5 weeks apart, diff.pregs. Move to same preg.

Y00174D

C

Double miscarriage (same date) entered as though two separate pregnancies

Y00247E

Miscarriage, then live birth 8 months later, different preg. Pregf=1 (‘early’): Assume OK.

Y00293N

Miscarriage, then twins six months later: assume same pregnancy, so leave as is.

Y20154L

C

Two live births 5 months apart, diff.pregs. (??????). 2 other pregs wrongly bunched.

Y31043N

Miscarriage, then live birth 7 months later, same preg. Pregf=1 (‘on time’): Assume OK.

* Although it would obviously be impossible to have a miscarriage from a new conception as soon as
one month after a previous pregnancy outcome, the fact that we never know the ‘day’ within the month
for miscarriages means that there could possibly be as much as eight weeks between the two events,
making it just about plausible.



More intriguing information

1. Investment and Interest Rate Policy in the Open Economy
2. Spousal Labor Market Effects from Government Health Insurance: Evidence from a Veterans Affairs Expansion
3. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE
4. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
5. The name is absent
6. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
7. Palvelujen vienti ja kansainvälistyminen
8. The name is absent
9. Fertility in Developing Countries
10. Telecommuting and environmental policy - lessons from the Ecommute program