Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!? On the Role of Entrepreneurial Experience for Firm Survival



Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!?

21


Taylor, M.P. (1999), 'Survival of the Fittest? An Analysis of Self-employment
Duration in Britain'
, The Economic Journal 109 (454), C140-C155.

Ucbasaran, D., P. Westhead and M. Wright (2006), 'Habitual Entrepreneurs
Experiencing Failure: Overconfidence and the Motivation to Try Again'
,
Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth
9, 9-28.

Ucbasaran, D., M. Wright and P. Westhead (2003), 'A Longitudinal of Habitual
Entrepreneurs: Starters and Acquirers'
, Entrpreuneurship & Regional
Development
15, 207-228.

Van den Steen, E. (2004), 'Rational Overoptimism (and Other Biases)', The
American Economic Review
94 (4), 1141-1151.

Van Praag, C.M. (2003), 'Business Survival and Success of Young Small Busi-
ness Owners '
, Small Business Economics 21, 1-17.

Wagner, J. (2003), 'Taking a Second Chance: Entrepreneurial Re-starters in
Germany'
, Applied Economics Quarterly 49 (3), 255-272.

Wennekers, S. and R. Thurik (1999), 'Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic
Growth'
, Small Business Economics 13, 27-55.

Westhead, P., D. Ucbasaran, M. Wright and M. Binks (2005), 'Novice, Serial
and Portfolio Entrepreneur Behaviour and Contributions'
, Small Business
Economics
25, 109-132.

Westhead, P. and M. Wright (1998), 'Novice, Portfolio, and Serial Founders:
Are they Different?'
Journal of Business Venturing 13 (3), 173.

Notes

1 This approximation to identify voluntary firm closures has been validated by real exit dates of
voluntary closures obtained from the ZEW Founder Study (see Almus et al. 2001 for details on
the survey).

2 Within-industry experience is measured as previous entrepreneurial experience within the
same NACE-4-digit category for each considered firm.

3 Multiple entrepreneurial experiences are given if an entrepreneur has been involved in more
than one firm prior to participation in the business considered.

4 Using different graphical methods for testing reveals no grounds for a violation of the PH-
assumption.

5 Table 4 reports coefficients rather than hazard rates. To obtain hazard rates the coefficients
have to be exponentiated. Since exp(0.315) = 1.370 the closure probability increases by about 37
percent.



More intriguing information

1. Intertemporal Risk Management Decisions of Farmers under Preference, Market, and Policy Dynamics
2. Nonlinear Production, Abatement, Pollution and Materials Balance Reconsidered
3. The name is absent
4. The Tangible Contribution of R&D Spending Foreign-Owned Plants to a Host Region: a Plant Level Study of the Irish Manufacturing Sector (1980-1996)
5. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.
6. Thresholds for Employment and Unemployment - a Spatial Analysis of German Regional Labour Markets 1992-2000
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Optimal Rent Extraction in Pre-Industrial England and France – Default Risk and Monitoring Costs
10. QUEST II. A Multi-Country Business Cycle and Growth Model
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
15. Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California
16. Sustainability of economic development and governance patterns in water management - an overview on the reorganisation of public utilities in Campania, Italy, under EU Framework Directive in the field of water policy (2000/60/CE)
17. The Variable-Rate Decision for Multiple Inputs with Multiple Management Zones
18. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
19. The name is absent
20. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile