Perfect Regular Equilibrium



δt~1μtΓ1

Next, we formally define the sequential rationality in general games. For notational
simplicity, given a player
i and a period t, let a functional Et : Θt × A1 × ∙ ∙ ∙ × At 1 ×
Φ ×
∏ —> R (= R U {-∞, ∞}) be a conditional expected utility functional15 where Φ × ∏
is the set of all assessments. That is, for each (θt, a1,..., at 1 ) Θt × A1 × ∙ ∙ ∙ × At 1,
Et(θt, a1, ...,at~1; μ, δ) denotes an expected utility value with respect to the system of beliefs μ
and the strategy profile δ conditional on reaching the information set Θ-t × {(θt, a1,..., at 1)}.
Definition 5 A strategy profile δ is sequentially rational with respect to a system of belief's
μ if, given each i and t, and given each
(θt, a1,..., at 1) Θt × A1 × ∙ ∙ ∙ × At 1, we have
Efiθ
t,a1,...,at-1μ,δ~)Eti(θi, a1,..., at~1 ; μ, (δ'i-tfi) for every δ'i i

Here, a set Θ-t × {(θt,a1,...,at 1 )} denotes an information set of player i. Thus, the
sequential rationality requires that, in responding to the other players’ strategies δ
~t, each
player
i make its best response δt with respect to the system of beliefs μ, which would induce
the greatest expected utility value given any of its information sets
Θ-t × {(θt, a1,..., at 1)}.

15 Formally, the conditional expected utility functional is implicitly defined just like the expected utility
functional. So, given
i and t, the conditional expected utility functional Eti is a unique function satisfying
the following conditions for any arbitrary strategy profile
δ. First, if Efiθi, a1,..., Cit~1; μ, δ) is finite, then, for
any
ε > 0, there exist both a period t' {t,..., T} and a sequence of actions t +1,..., aτ) At +1 × ∙ ∙ ∙ × Aτ
such that for any t'' t',

I Eii, a ,..., a ; μ, δ ʃθ Ja^ ∙ ∙ ∙ JAirr ufiθi, θi, a ,..., a , a ,..., a ,h ,...,
aτ )δt (θ i-i,cι 1,...,at -1; dat ) ∙∙∙ δt(θ ii,Cι, 1,...,a t~1; dafiμti(θ i,Cι 1,...,C t~1; d.θ i) < ε.

Second, if Eit(θ i,a 1,..,Cl t~1; μ,δ) is infinite, then, for any M N, there exist both a period t' {t,...,T}
and a sequence of actions (at +1,..., aτ) At +1 × ∙ ∙ ∙ × Aτ such that for any t''t',

Jh JAi ∙ ∙ ∙ JAi" ui(θi-i, Ci 1,..., Cit~1,at, ...,at'', at''+1, ...,Ct)δt (θi, θ~i,a1,

..., at -1; dat ) ∙ ∙ ∙ δt(θi, θ~i, d1,..., dt~1; dat')μti(θi, a1,..., dt~1; i )

>M when E*(θ i,a 1,...,at-1; μ, δ) =and -M when Eti(θ i,a 1,..,at~1; μ,δ) = -∞.

Again, this definition of the conditional expected utility functional makes sense according to Ash (1972, 2.6).

21



More intriguing information

1. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.
2. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting
3. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
4. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective
9. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax
10. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS' WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR REAL-TIME MESOSCALE WEATHER INFORMATION
11. The Dynamic Cost of the Draft
12. Spectral density bandwith choice and prewightening in the estimation of heteroskadasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrices in panel data models
13. The name is absent
14. AJAE Appendix: Willingness to Pay Versus Expected Consumption Value in Vickrey Auctions for New Experience Goods
15. The name is absent
16. Federal Tax-Transfer Policy and Intergovernmental Pre-Commitment
17. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
18. Managing Human Resources in Higher Education: The Implications of a Diversifying Workforce
19. WP 92 - An overview of women's work and employment in Azerbaijan
20. Dynamiques des Entreprises Agroalimentaires (EAA) du Languedoc-Roussillon : évolutions 1998-2003. Programme de recherche PSDR 2001-2006 financé par l'Inra et la Région Languedoc-Roussillon