Table 3. Estimation results of the employment probabilities for employees (male and female
samples)
|
Variable |
___________Employment probabilities (employees)___________ | |||
|
__________Female__________ |
___________Male___________ | |||
|
Coefficient |
T-value |
Coefficient |
T-value | |
|
CONSTANT ~ |
-0.40774 |
-2.880 |
0.11501 |
0.770 |
|
Educational performance______________ |
0.00211 |
2.660 |
-0.00004 |
-0.050 |
|
Sciences____________________________ |
0.79611 |
9.810 |
0.31538 |
4.520 |
|
Pharmacy________________________ |
1.10942 |
18.530 |
0.51041 |
7.530 |
|
Natural sciences_______________________ |
0.56726 |
9.820 |
0.19276 |
2.760 |
|
Engineering__________________________ |
1.34976 |
19.820 |
1.24828 |
24.280 |
|
Architecture_____________________________ |
1.24957 |
18.570 |
0.87663 |
11.880 |
|
Agricultural studies______________________ |
0.91999 |
11.510 |
0.62628 |
7.280 |
|
Economics, business and statistics_____ |
0.99523 |
22.500 |
0.75041 |
15.470 |
|
Political sciences and sociology_________ |
1.15891 |
22.230 |
0.62422 |
9.810 |
|
Law____________________________ |
0.39985 |
9.290 |
0.21823 |
4.360 |
|
Humanities___________________________ |
0.99855 |
17.350 |
0.33098 |
4.420 |
|
Foreign languages____________________ |
1.05389 |
16.320 |
0.68531 |
5.190 |
|
Teachers college_____________________ |
1.16688 |
16.77 |
0.90959 |
6.440 |
|
Psychology_________________________ |
0.86643 |
10.370 |
0.51204 |
5.310 |
|
University of North_______________________ |
-0.03092 |
-0.610 |
0.05380 |
0.970 |
|
University of Center____________________ |
-0.03418 |
-0.750 |
0.04650 |
0.930 |
|
d Liceo________________________________ |
-0.18332 |
-6.140 |
-0.09455 |
-2.870 |
|
d Moved to attend university____________ |
0.04979 |
1.620 |
0.05416 |
1.560 |
|
Erasmus_________________________ |
0.00179 |
0.040 |
-0.04484 |
0.930 |
|
Married________________________________ |
0.02327 |
0.770 |
0.29326 |
7.030 |
|
Children_______________________________ |
-0.24011 |
-5.470 |
0.18525 |
2.710 |
|
d Father’s university degree____________ |
0.02472 |
0.550 |
-0.05689 |
-1.140 |
|
d Father’s high school degree__________ |
0.06245 |
0.100 |
0.03627 |
0.920 |
|
d Mother’s degree_____________________ |
-0.01029 |
-0.210 |
0.01988 |
0.370 |
|
d High school_________________________ |
0.00679 |
0.200 |
0.03721 |
0.095 |
|
d Father’s occupation: manager________ |
-0.03102 |
-0.600 |
-0.01754 |
-0.320 |
|
d Father’s occupation: executive cadre |
0.01070 |
0.220 |
-0.06419 |
-1.250 |
|
d Father’s occupation: white collar______ |
0.02907 |
0.760 |
-0.01106 |
-0.250 |
|
d Mother’s occupation: executive cadre |
-0.02730 |
-0.580 |
-0.01326 |
-0.260 |
|
d Mother’s occupation: white collar______ |
-0.02826 |
-0.830 |
-0.01810 |
-0.470 |
|
d Father employed___________________ |
0.02325 |
0.380 |
0.06934 |
0.098 |
|
d Father self-employed________________ |
0.08043 |
2.460 |
-0.00925 |
-0.240 |
|
d Attended private courses at university |
0.24619 |
2.970 |
0.08003 |
0.096 |
|
d Working student____________________ |
0.38804 |
14.770 |
0.39104 |
13.220 |
|
Training_________________________________ |
-0.52419 |
-15.990 |
-0.71315 |
-19.740 |
|
Region dummies____________________ |
______X______ |
______X______ | ||
|
Number of observations______________ |
13499 |
11909 | ||
|
Percent Correctly Predicted_____________ |
73.8944 |
78.1678 | ||
Moreover, we use whenever possible, the same set of variables to explain the wage gap between all
the population groups considered6.
We note that there is a significant gender difference in graduates earnings: female average earnings
are about 89% of male average earnings. From the separate regression analyses by gender, we
calculate the Oaxaca decomposition and find that only about 12% of the gender gap can be
6 - OLS estimation results of the earnings equations underlying Tables 3-9 are conducted similarly to the earnings
equation presented in Table 2. Calculations are not presented here for brevity, but will be provided by the authors to
anyone who requests.
More intriguing information
1. On the job rotation problem2. Heavy Hero or Digital Dummy: multimodal player-avatar relations in FINAL FANTASY 7
3. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
4. Asymmetric transfer of the dynamic motion aftereffect between first- and second-order cues and among different second-order cues
5. Strategic monetary policy in a monetary union with non-atomistic wage setters
6. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
7. Bidding for Envy-Freeness: A Procedural Approach to n-Player Fair Division Problems
8. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
9. The name is absent
10. The Composition of Government Spending and the Real Exchange Rate