Table 3. Estimation results of the employment probabilities for employees (male and female
samples)
|
Variable |
___________Employment probabilities (employees)___________ | |||
|
__________Female__________ |
___________Male___________ | |||
|
Coefficient |
T-value |
Coefficient |
T-value | |
|
CONSTANT ~ |
-0.40774 |
-2.880 |
0.11501 |
0.770 |
|
Educational performance______________ |
0.00211 |
2.660 |
-0.00004 |
-0.050 |
|
Sciences____________________________ |
0.79611 |
9.810 |
0.31538 |
4.520 |
|
Pharmacy________________________ |
1.10942 |
18.530 |
0.51041 |
7.530 |
|
Natural sciences_______________________ |
0.56726 |
9.820 |
0.19276 |
2.760 |
|
Engineering__________________________ |
1.34976 |
19.820 |
1.24828 |
24.280 |
|
Architecture_____________________________ |
1.24957 |
18.570 |
0.87663 |
11.880 |
|
Agricultural studies______________________ |
0.91999 |
11.510 |
0.62628 |
7.280 |
|
Economics, business and statistics_____ |
0.99523 |
22.500 |
0.75041 |
15.470 |
|
Political sciences and sociology_________ |
1.15891 |
22.230 |
0.62422 |
9.810 |
|
Law____________________________ |
0.39985 |
9.290 |
0.21823 |
4.360 |
|
Humanities___________________________ |
0.99855 |
17.350 |
0.33098 |
4.420 |
|
Foreign languages____________________ |
1.05389 |
16.320 |
0.68531 |
5.190 |
|
Teachers college_____________________ |
1.16688 |
16.77 |
0.90959 |
6.440 |
|
Psychology_________________________ |
0.86643 |
10.370 |
0.51204 |
5.310 |
|
University of North_______________________ |
-0.03092 |
-0.610 |
0.05380 |
0.970 |
|
University of Center____________________ |
-0.03418 |
-0.750 |
0.04650 |
0.930 |
|
d Liceo________________________________ |
-0.18332 |
-6.140 |
-0.09455 |
-2.870 |
|
d Moved to attend university____________ |
0.04979 |
1.620 |
0.05416 |
1.560 |
|
Erasmus_________________________ |
0.00179 |
0.040 |
-0.04484 |
0.930 |
|
Married________________________________ |
0.02327 |
0.770 |
0.29326 |
7.030 |
|
Children_______________________________ |
-0.24011 |
-5.470 |
0.18525 |
2.710 |
|
d Father’s university degree____________ |
0.02472 |
0.550 |
-0.05689 |
-1.140 |
|
d Father’s high school degree__________ |
0.06245 |
0.100 |
0.03627 |
0.920 |
|
d Mother’s degree_____________________ |
-0.01029 |
-0.210 |
0.01988 |
0.370 |
|
d High school_________________________ |
0.00679 |
0.200 |
0.03721 |
0.095 |
|
d Father’s occupation: manager________ |
-0.03102 |
-0.600 |
-0.01754 |
-0.320 |
|
d Father’s occupation: executive cadre |
0.01070 |
0.220 |
-0.06419 |
-1.250 |
|
d Father’s occupation: white collar______ |
0.02907 |
0.760 |
-0.01106 |
-0.250 |
|
d Mother’s occupation: executive cadre |
-0.02730 |
-0.580 |
-0.01326 |
-0.260 |
|
d Mother’s occupation: white collar______ |
-0.02826 |
-0.830 |
-0.01810 |
-0.470 |
|
d Father employed___________________ |
0.02325 |
0.380 |
0.06934 |
0.098 |
|
d Father self-employed________________ |
0.08043 |
2.460 |
-0.00925 |
-0.240 |
|
d Attended private courses at university |
0.24619 |
2.970 |
0.08003 |
0.096 |
|
d Working student____________________ |
0.38804 |
14.770 |
0.39104 |
13.220 |
|
Training_________________________________ |
-0.52419 |
-15.990 |
-0.71315 |
-19.740 |
|
Region dummies____________________ |
______X______ |
______X______ | ||
|
Number of observations______________ |
13499 |
11909 | ||
|
Percent Correctly Predicted_____________ |
73.8944 |
78.1678 | ||
Moreover, we use whenever possible, the same set of variables to explain the wage gap between all
the population groups considered6.
We note that there is a significant gender difference in graduates earnings: female average earnings
are about 89% of male average earnings. From the separate regression analyses by gender, we
calculate the Oaxaca decomposition and find that only about 12% of the gender gap can be
6 - OLS estimation results of the earnings equations underlying Tables 3-9 are conducted similarly to the earnings
equation presented in Table 2. Calculations are not presented here for brevity, but will be provided by the authors to
anyone who requests.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Who runs the IFIs?
3. Return Predictability and Stock Market Crashes in a Simple Rational Expectations Model
4. A Computational Model of Children's Semantic Memory
5. Altruism with Social Roots: An Emerging Literature
6. The constitution and evolution of the stars
7. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
8. Estimation of marginal abatement costs for undesirable outputs in India's power generation sector: An output distance function approach.
9. The name is absent
10. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules