Table 3. Estimation results of the employment probabilities for employees (male and female
samples)
|
Variable |
___________Employment probabilities (employees)___________ | |||
|
__________Female__________ |
___________Male___________ | |||
|
Coefficient |
T-value |
Coefficient |
T-value | |
|
CONSTANT ~ |
-0.40774 |
-2.880 |
0.11501 |
0.770 |
|
Educational performance______________ |
0.00211 |
2.660 |
-0.00004 |
-0.050 |
|
Sciences____________________________ |
0.79611 |
9.810 |
0.31538 |
4.520 |
|
Pharmacy________________________ |
1.10942 |
18.530 |
0.51041 |
7.530 |
|
Natural sciences_______________________ |
0.56726 |
9.820 |
0.19276 |
2.760 |
|
Engineering__________________________ |
1.34976 |
19.820 |
1.24828 |
24.280 |
|
Architecture_____________________________ |
1.24957 |
18.570 |
0.87663 |
11.880 |
|
Agricultural studies______________________ |
0.91999 |
11.510 |
0.62628 |
7.280 |
|
Economics, business and statistics_____ |
0.99523 |
22.500 |
0.75041 |
15.470 |
|
Political sciences and sociology_________ |
1.15891 |
22.230 |
0.62422 |
9.810 |
|
Law____________________________ |
0.39985 |
9.290 |
0.21823 |
4.360 |
|
Humanities___________________________ |
0.99855 |
17.350 |
0.33098 |
4.420 |
|
Foreign languages____________________ |
1.05389 |
16.320 |
0.68531 |
5.190 |
|
Teachers college_____________________ |
1.16688 |
16.77 |
0.90959 |
6.440 |
|
Psychology_________________________ |
0.86643 |
10.370 |
0.51204 |
5.310 |
|
University of North_______________________ |
-0.03092 |
-0.610 |
0.05380 |
0.970 |
|
University of Center____________________ |
-0.03418 |
-0.750 |
0.04650 |
0.930 |
|
d Liceo________________________________ |
-0.18332 |
-6.140 |
-0.09455 |
-2.870 |
|
d Moved to attend university____________ |
0.04979 |
1.620 |
0.05416 |
1.560 |
|
Erasmus_________________________ |
0.00179 |
0.040 |
-0.04484 |
0.930 |
|
Married________________________________ |
0.02327 |
0.770 |
0.29326 |
7.030 |
|
Children_______________________________ |
-0.24011 |
-5.470 |
0.18525 |
2.710 |
|
d Father’s university degree____________ |
0.02472 |
0.550 |
-0.05689 |
-1.140 |
|
d Father’s high school degree__________ |
0.06245 |
0.100 |
0.03627 |
0.920 |
|
d Mother’s degree_____________________ |
-0.01029 |
-0.210 |
0.01988 |
0.370 |
|
d High school_________________________ |
0.00679 |
0.200 |
0.03721 |
0.095 |
|
d Father’s occupation: manager________ |
-0.03102 |
-0.600 |
-0.01754 |
-0.320 |
|
d Father’s occupation: executive cadre |
0.01070 |
0.220 |
-0.06419 |
-1.250 |
|
d Father’s occupation: white collar______ |
0.02907 |
0.760 |
-0.01106 |
-0.250 |
|
d Mother’s occupation: executive cadre |
-0.02730 |
-0.580 |
-0.01326 |
-0.260 |
|
d Mother’s occupation: white collar______ |
-0.02826 |
-0.830 |
-0.01810 |
-0.470 |
|
d Father employed___________________ |
0.02325 |
0.380 |
0.06934 |
0.098 |
|
d Father self-employed________________ |
0.08043 |
2.460 |
-0.00925 |
-0.240 |
|
d Attended private courses at university |
0.24619 |
2.970 |
0.08003 |
0.096 |
|
d Working student____________________ |
0.38804 |
14.770 |
0.39104 |
13.220 |
|
Training_________________________________ |
-0.52419 |
-15.990 |
-0.71315 |
-19.740 |
|
Region dummies____________________ |
______X______ |
______X______ | ||
|
Number of observations______________ |
13499 |
11909 | ||
|
Percent Correctly Predicted_____________ |
73.8944 |
78.1678 | ||
Moreover, we use whenever possible, the same set of variables to explain the wage gap between all
the population groups considered6.
We note that there is a significant gender difference in graduates earnings: female average earnings
are about 89% of male average earnings. From the separate regression analyses by gender, we
calculate the Oaxaca decomposition and find that only about 12% of the gender gap can be
6 - OLS estimation results of the earnings equations underlying Tables 3-9 are conducted similarly to the earnings
equation presented in Table 2. Calculations are not presented here for brevity, but will be provided by the authors to
anyone who requests.
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Voting by Committees under Constraints
3. The name is absent
4. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
5. Valuing Farm Financial Information
6. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
7. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
8. Informal Labour and Credit Markets: A Survey.
9. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
10. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs