Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective



Chart 6 Aggregate labour productivity
growth developments: Europe versus the

United States

Sources: OECD, NCBs and ECB calculations.


- as well as from the high technology intensity
sector. Indeed, while in the 1980s the weight of
the high technology intensity manufacturing
sector was lower in the United States compared
with the EU, it turned higher at the end of the
1990s thanks to a much more rapid expansion of
the high technology intensity manufacturing
sector in the United States. The weight of the
high technology intensity sector in the EU has
even tended to decrease over the last 15 years.
Regarding business sector services, the main
difference has arisen from the wholesale and
retail trade, the output share of which is on
average 5-8 percentage points higher in the
United States than in the EU, depending on the
period.

As regards the differences in aggregate labour
productivity developments (see Table 3), the
EU has enjoyed a stronger increase over the
period 1985-2001 than the United States.
However, the comparison of long-run averages
hides the slowdown of labour productivity
increases in the EU and the euro area in the
second half of the 1990s compared with a
substantial pick-up of labour productivity
growth rates in the United States over the same
period (see Chart 6). This growing difference of
aggregate productivity developments between
the United States and the EU/euro area in the
second half of the 1990s is partly explained by a
stronger labour productivity performance in the

Chart 7 Lilien indicator for Europe and the
United States

Euro area

.......... EU
≡≡ USA

Total economy (excl. social community and personal services)

0.030

0.025

0.020

0.015

0.010

0.005

0.000

0.030

0.025

0.020

0.015

0.010

0.005

0.000

1985-1989 j 1996-2001

Manufacturing

0.030

0.025

0.020

0.015

0.010

0.005

0.000


0.030

0.025

0.020

0.015

0.010

0.005

0.000


■ ■

j 1985-1989 j 1996-2001

Utilities and business services

■ I

1985-1989 ʃ 1996-2001

0.030

0.025

0.020

0.015

0.010

0.005

0.000


0.030

0.025

0.020

0.015

0.010

0.005

0.000


Sources: OECD, NCBs and ECB calculations.

Note : The figures for the euro area and the EU refer to weighted
averages; they do not include Greece, Ireland and Luxembourg on
account of missing sectors.

wholesale and retail trade and financial
intermediation, two ICT-using services sectors
that - taken together - account for about 17% of
total gross value added in the euro area and
almost 27% of total gross value added in the
United States.37

Looking at the disaggregated level in
manufacturing and business sector services,
labour productivity growth in both sectors was

37 See B. van Ark, R. Inklaar, and R. H. McGuckin (2003), “ICT
and productivity in Europe and the United States. Where do the
differences come from?”, University of Groningen, mimeo and
European Commission (2003), The EU Economy: 2003 Review,
Brussels.

ECB

Occasional Paper No. 19

July 2004



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. Accurate, fast and stable denoising source separation algorithms
4. Segmentación en la era de la globalización: ¿Cómo encontrar un segmento nuevo de mercado?
5. Manufacturing Earnings and Cycles: New Evidence
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
9. The name is absent
10. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
11. Towards a Strategy for Improving Agricultural Inputs Markets in Africa
12. Income Taxation when Markets are Incomplete
13. The name is absent
14. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
15. Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion: What One Should Know Before Running a Test
16. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
17. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Volatility in Precious Metals Markets
18. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
19. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties
20. IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS ON FARM PROFITABILITY